@santiago@MonaApp@MaJ1@tootapp Btw., this is what happens when I do as #ChatGPT suggests. It fails to mention that this is a #Windows only method of entering codes. I’m not sure whether #Linux can do that, but an #Apple#Mac can’t, because #macOS has other means of accessing special characters.
@pallenberg Die Landesverwaltung #SchleswigHolstein darf #ChatGPT demnächst nutzen, wenn auch unter starken Einschränkungen. Das ITEG-SH macht den Einsatz rechtlich möglich.
Solving causal #reasoning tasks is a hallmark of intelligence. One recent study [1] categorizes these tasks into covariance-based and logic-based reasoning (screenshot) and examines how #GPT models perform on causal discovery, actual causality, and causal judgments.
Coincidentally, another recent study systematically tests how many books GPT models have memorized [3]. The researchers used a similar approach in the form of a name cloze test (screenshot 1) and found that the models do retain substantial information from these books (GPT4 remembers more than #ChatGPT; screenshot 2).
✅ 2 PM EDT: The Digital Domain with @nick and Bob returns to its silly normal. The narrator of an HKC favorite book series goes Eleven Labs, and what does Derek's girlfriend have to do with it?
✅ 4 PM: That Party Show! @hannah_renee_11 plays your up-tempo, weekend party favorites and gives you a drink mix recipe, maybe?
✅ 7 PM: The Country Bar and Grill reopens, and @chris is making the drinks and running the jukebox. Country Music!
Still ahead. #ElevenLabs R.C. Bray reads a #ChatGPT story composed by Derek...but what does Derek's girlfriend have to do with it? More silliness with AI and your calls and messages. It's hour 2 of the Digital Domain with @nick and Bob!
“OpenAI’s new privacy and data protection extends only to customers who use the company’s API services. ‘We may use Content from Services other than our API,’ the company’s updated Terms of Use note. That could include, for example, text that employees enter into the wildly popular chatbot ChatGPT. Amazon reportedly recently warned employees not to share confidential information with ChatGPT for fear that it might show up in answers.”
I’m not against #AI tech in principle. But I do think we need to be quite concerned about who currently leads its development, and we should be actively seeking out and supporting ethical alternatives, just like we’re doing here on the Fediverse.
“The challenge for the open movement is already clear: build an alternative to corporate, closed machine learning systems. And to protect the commons from exploitation by these systems.”
ChatGPT is optimized for giving the most predictable, obvious response.
Usually that means it's dull and boring, but I find it useful sometimes, when I end up thinking too divergently about something, I need help finding the obvious solution right that's in front of my face.
What are you staring at?
Move on, nothing to see here!
While humans are very gullible when it comes to language, realizing how little "understanding" those LLMs have about any concept at all is easier using vision. We tolerate way fewer visual errors than we do language errors, and the AI scammers know that.
It’s not just the public. Some of your friends at your newspaper have been a bit credulous. In my book, “Rebooting A.I.,” we talked about the Eliza effect — we called it the “gullibility gap.” In the mid-1960s, Joseph Weizenbaum wrote this primitive piece of software called Eliza, and some people started spilling their guts to it. It was set up as a psychotherapist, and it was doing keyword matching. It didn’t know what it was talking about, but it wrote text, and people didn’t understand that a machine could write text and not know what it was talking about. The same thing is happening right now. It is very easy for human beings to attribute awareness to things that don’t have it. The cleverest thing that OpenAI did was to have GPT type its answers out one character at a time — made it look like a person was doing it. That adds to the illusion. It is sucking people in and making them believe that there’s a there there that isn’t there. That’s dangerous. We saw the Jonathan Turley incident, when it made up sexual harassment charges. You have to remember, these systems don’t understand what they’re reading. They’re collecting statistics about the relations between words. If everybody looked at these systems and said, “It’s kind of a neat party trick, but haha, it’s not real,” it wouldn’t be so disconcerting. But people believe it because it’s a search engine. It’s from Microsoft. We trust Microsoft. Combine that human overattribution with the reality that these systems don’t know what they’re talking about and are error-prone, and you have a problem."
The best use for #ChatGPT I found is to have it write these German notes for me based off an English prompt. I hate typing out all of these set German phrases (Floskeln). By the looks of this it can even generate those DABs.
One question I have though is: Can Germans differentiate between ChatGPT generated German and bureaucratic German? It feels like there is a very thin line between the two.
#AI#GenerativeAI#ChatGPT#HumanRights: "ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence (AI) are dominating headlines and conversations. We see it when people post strange and intriguing screenshots of chatbot conversations or images on social media, and we can now “interact” with chatbots on search platforms. But what’s behind this technology? Who feeds it data and decides where the data comes from? What does this have to do with human rights? Senior Web Producer Paul Aufiero speaks with Anna Bacciarelli, program manager in Human Rights Watch’s Tech and Human Rights division, about the questions at the center of this new debate, as companies race to develop and implement generative AI."
「 we aren’t positioned to win this arms race and neither is OpenAI. While we’ve been squabbling, a third faction has been quietly eating our lunch.
I’m talking, of course, about open source. Plainly put, they are lapping us. Things we consider “major open problems” are solved and in people’s hands today 」
— semianalysis.com
FWIW if you're using the free "research" version of ChatGPT you're probably still getting conversations mixed up with other users. At 6am this morning I started a new thread and gave it a list of data points. Then asked it to start summarizing data as topics. The result was based on a completely different list of data points and didn't match any previous threads in my account. #ChatGPT https://apnews.com/article/chatgpt-openai-data-privacy-italy-b9ab3d12f2b2cfe493237fd2b9675e21