wjmaggos, to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Kinda shocked (but happy) to hear the libertarians on the weekly #Reason podcast all speak well of #RankedChoiceVoting. Yes, it would do wonders to fix our politics.
https://pca.st/episode/ad87365b-445e-486e-a1bd-515f1cc90fa4

Crell, to random
@Crell@phpc.social avatar
br00t4c, to random
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
Heliograph, to random
@Heliograph@mastodon.au avatar

@benroyce voting third part applies to OZ as much as it does to all countries I guess... and but yes fully agree

benroyce,
@benroyce@mastodon.social avatar

@Heliograph we need aka preferential voting, so 3rd parties can be stable and have a chance

but a 2 party system is locked in because of voting. 3rd parties can never dominate: duverger's law. a 3rd party vote is self-destruction of your own interests

: ranked choice is slowly creeping in, mostly spearheaded by . so who are you going to for if you want robust 3rd parties?

learn from !:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bleyX4oMCgM

weilawei, to Ohio
@weilawei@mastodon.online avatar

The fascists are trying to lock in the system permanently, by eliminating the only non-violent way out of the two-party ratchet that we have now.

They want to ban ranked choice voting. Don't let them. Demand Single Transferable Vote.

(instant runoff is not a good way to do RCV; STV works the way people intuitively expect ranked-choice votes to work.)

https://www.legislature.ohio.gov/legislation/135/sb137

weilawei,
@weilawei@mastodon.online avatar

For that person going around saying, "if voting did anything, they'd try to ban it":

THEY ARE TRYING TO BAN IT.

You know what would really screw up the fascist strategy?

Single Transferable Vote.

alan, to washington
@alan@subdued.social avatar

People forget that Gov Inslee appointed Hobbs to Secretary of State to get him out of the way in the because he was such an obstructionist. Now, no surprise, he's being an obstructionist in the SoS office.

https://www.theurbanist.org/2024/02/11/op-ed-state-secretary-hobbs-is-wrong-to-oppose-ranked-choice-voting/

Crell, to random
@Crell@phpc.social avatar

Related: Any politician or insurance salesman that says "you can pick your own insurance company" in our current system, and that's why we shouldn't have like every other civilized country, is a lying turd, a baldfaced liar, a charlatan, and a threat to America.

The US cannot claim to be a civilized country until the health insurance industry is utterly destroyed and replaced with a national system. Liars and all.

Crell,
@Crell@phpc.social avatar

@michelle Yeah, one of the reasons why I am working on 🙂

alan, to random
@alan@subdued.social avatar

Great news that the tool is now under the management of a worker-owned software coop called Cohere! OpaVote is an easy-to-use website that lets you host online. I can't count how many elections I've administered via this excellent tool as part of my advocacy for democratic reforms like and in particular. Congrats to @Zee, @anaulin and the team!
🗳️ https://blog.opavote.com/2024/01/opavote-is-under-new-management.html

br00t4c, to Alaska
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
wjmaggos, to random
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

Such a silly process. We need .

majorlinux, to random
@majorlinux@toot.majorshouse.com avatar

Yet another white not understanding why someone who looks like me would not be voting blue (and red because we have to say that now).

The fact that me voicing my opinion and explaining it on an account that has been verified to be authentic is equivalent to a Russian bot account is pathetic.

They'd rather dehumanize you then actually listen to reason.

BlueDot @BlueDot @majorlinux It means that for the next election and probably more, there will be on the ballot and the Democratic candidate is the only alternative to electing a . Doesn't have to be that way for long. We could make a national minimum standard and get rid of first-past-the-post elections. Then your first-choice vote for a socialist third party candidate wouldn't help the Republican. That's not achievable if Republicans succeed in ending democracy. T Jan 19, 2024 at 12:46
@majorlinux @BlueDot Fascism is already hear for a lot of Americans under Imperialism fueled by the capitalist class. Democrats seek to uphold the status quo for the capitalist while further disenfranchising the working class. This will happen either way with the current two party system. We do have a choice to fight against the current imperialist, capitalist, white supremacist, fascist regime. Jan 19,2024 at 13:20 via Ivory
BlueDot @BlueDot @majorlinux The Democratic Party has sins to answer for. Lots of them. But if you think there's no important difference between Democrats and Republicans, we have no common ground. Russian trolls have been working hard to sow division among Democrats, so Trump will get reelected. I block them, and I also block everybody who sounds exactly like them. Jan 19, 2024 at 13:40

alan, to random
@alan@subdued.social avatar

Hey Washington State residents: the "Washington VOICES Act", HB 2250, has a hearing in the legislature in less than a week! We need you to sign in "pro" in favor of this bill to show your support to the State Government Committee. Please do it before January 24! It's quick and easy:

https://app.leg.wa.gov/csi/Testifier/Add?chamber=House&mId=31747&aId=157226&caId=23529&tId=3&ms=20240118SignInPro&utm_campaign=20240118signinpro&utm_medium=email&utm_source=everyaction&emci=881bf250-55b6-ee11-bea1-0022482237da&emdi=03697a1d-5bb6-ee11-bea1-0022482237da&ceid=885644

br00t4c, to Alaska
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
alan, to random
@alan@subdued.social avatar

New research from : elections benefit candidates and voters of color.

  • Candidates of color benefit from the RCV counting process, gaining more support as lower-performing candidates are eliminated.
  • RCV allows several candidates of color to run in the same race without “splitting the vote.”
  • Voters of color tend to rank more candidates than White voters.

https://fairvote.org/report/communities-of-color-2024/

majorlinux, to random
@majorlinux@toot.majorshouse.com avatar

I find it interesting that Democratic talking heads on YouTube always point to Republicans and say they vote for "party over country”.

Remind me:

What does “vote blue no matter who" mean?

BlueDot,

@majorlinux

It means that for the next election and probably more, there will be on the ballot and the Democratic candidate is the only alternative to electing a .

Doesn't have to be that way for long. We could make a national minimum standard and get rid of first-past-the-post elections. Then your first-choice vote for a socialist third party candidate wouldn't help the Republican.

That's not achievable if Republicans succeed in ending democracy.

dgoldsmith, to random
@dgoldsmith@mastodon.social avatar

We need to get over the idea that voting is a way for us to express our personal ideals. Voting is one move in a chess game that never ends—one each voter plays with a hundred million other voters. You can't win on the first move, and if you're in a bad board position it may take a long time to get out of it. (Narrator voice: we're in a bad board position, in many ways.)

If you don't play, though, or don't make alliances with other players, you're likely to lose. Losing now will be very bad.

wjmaggos,
@wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

@dgoldsmith @mastodonmigration

every vote is a compromise if you're not the candidate. but FFV everywhere would be a huge improvement.

https://time.com/6112318/american-democracy-final-five-voting/

TurnipCannon, to random

If "of all the people we invited to speak, only white men could come" is even actually true, then it also brings up another big problem.

Ask WHY only these guys had the:

  • time to take off and go speak at a con
  • money to fly somewhere
  • money to get a hotel room
  • means to probably speak at this conference for no pay

Almost as if the scales are a WEE bit tipped

TrillionB,
@TrillionB@mstdn.social avatar

@TurnipCannon This is why we need .

A political party, which is a private organization with no official government relationship, has the right to choose their nominee however they want.

But the general public, in general elections, should be able to rank their preferences for any number of candidates and win with a true majority. Not worry they will "throw their vote away" and lose to a horrible candidate in a plurality election.

alan, to USpolitics
@alan@subdued.social avatar

Ok, interesting, but does anyone know if Adam Schiff supports or too?

"Schiff would abolish filibuster, end the Electoral College in his pro-democracy plan" via Politico

https://www.politico.com/news/2024/01/12/schiff-pro-democracy-plan-filibuster-electoral-college-00135232

cjm, to random

Great new article from the Sightline Institute about and the
WA Legislature this session.

The new bill (HB 2250 - The Washington VOICES Act) has been introduced and addresses some new developments in the state.

Read more here

https://www.sightline.org/2024/01/09/with-ranked-choice-voting-coming-to-washington-state-its-time-to-coordinate-rollout

alan, to random
@alan@subdued.social avatar

There's a new bill in the Washington State Legislature this year, this time called The Washington VOICES Act (HB 2250). Learn more about the bill on this page from FairVote Washington, and follow the links to write your state legislators and ask them to support this important reform! https://fairvotewa.org/ranked-choice-voting-legislation/

accretionist, to random

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • wjmaggos,
    @wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

    @accretionist @stensgaard @browren @jaycee

    both parties usually fight it. referendums. I specifically want FFV (final five voting). party primaries get replaced with a vote for your favorite candidate, and the top few get into the general election.

    our primary system (combined with gerrymandering) makes our elections mostly about candidates who best serve their party's interest. people willing to compromise or care more about integrity than interest groups, get weeded out.

    GottaLaff, to random
    @GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

    Via Robert Reich:

    The “I won’t vote for the lesser of 2 evils” rubbish

    “So 1 of the noms from 1 of the 2 major parties is going to win. & if you don’t vote, or you vote for 3rd party candidate, you’re inevitably hurting the candidate from 1 of major parties who’s closest to you in values — & helping the 1 farthest from you… as GOP has gone fascist, w unhinged at its head, potential consequences of your not voting or voting for a 3rd party candidate are horrific”
    https://open.substack.com/pub/robertreich/p/the-i-wont-vote-for-the-lesser-of?r=br61&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

    wjmaggos,
    @wjmaggos@liberal.city avatar

    @GottaLaff

    every vote is a compromise if you're not the candidate, but I've been alive 45 years and never not been told that we can't afford to vote third party this time. even with the electoral college for president in solid blue states. and I know Democrats are constantly pushing back against . and where is the public option Biden promised? vote strategically but also support reform. it just gets so tiresome.
    https://time.com/6112318/american-democracy-final-five-voting/

    harrybeary, to random

    There has to be a better, shorter way to say “party list proportional representation” in five syllables or less. Ideas:

    • ranked slate voting
    • instant slate voting
    • slate choice voting
    • member slate voting

    Problem is that I’m trying to find a shorter term which applies strictly to legislative elections. The use of the word “slate” can apply to any office, and I need to distinguish legislative elections from others.

    cdarwin, to random
    @cdarwin@c.im avatar

    In Arizona, Idaho, Pennsylvania, Oregon and Nevada initiatives are afoot to institute ✅ non-partisan primary elections, some involving ranked choice voting

    Whereas Ohio Republicans are seeking to ❌ close their state's primaries


    https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/states-considering-primary-election-changes-2024-rcna129736

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • InstantRegret
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • JUstTest
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • cisconetworking
  • tester
  • modclub
  • everett
  • cubers
  • tacticalgear
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • normalnudes
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines