In case you need it, wayback machine link for the article #wired#magazine removed, criticizing #google for doctoring #search#results to benefit their wallet.
“The war in #Ukraine has revealed significant deficiencies in the machinery of government in all #Nato capitals. The most glaring deficit is the inability of the Ukrainian partners to calculate the time frame that arises between #decisions and the desired #results. The delay between knowing what was needed and agreeing to do it has proven very costly”.
🗳️OHIO: If you're in line at the polls by 7:30 pm, STAY IN LINE. You have the right to cast your ballot as long as you're in line before the polls close.
☎️If you run into any issues while voting, call the Election Protection Hotline at 866-OUR-VOTE (866-687-8683)
A foundational problem with generative AI today is that any correct answers that it provides are easily contaminated by the incorrect and fabricated answers it provides. The perfect witch's brew for misinformation, especially when users are unlikely to bother checking any linked source sites (when such links are even provided).
It's spreading, fast. Just in the last two months I've seen search result quality absolutely plummet. Tons of top results seem to be LLM-generated garbage content vaguely related to the subject you're trying to find info on.
Search was pretty bad 6 months ago. I can't imagine how utterly useless it will be 6 months from now.
Too bad Google's spending all their time implementing generative "AI", rather than improving search results... ?