Matrix certrainly has its rough edges, but I find it awesome that pretty much every major Linux community now has their dedicated space. All federated, of course.
Je redonne sa chance à Fedora (40) et bon, là je sais pas trop comment m'en tirer mais j'ai les boites de dialogue d'ouverture de fichier qui sont toutes blanches sur les appimages. Genre, ça affiche rien, que du blanc.
C'est cool #linux#fedora mais des fois, c'est quand même chiant de devoir sans cesse chercher pourquoi un truc marche pas.
The Fedora Project is taking rpm-ostree and atomic systems to the next level with our bootc community initiative!
The goal is to evolve Fedora Atomic Desktops, Fedora CoreOS, and Fedora IoT to incorporate bootable containers. You will get the benefit of an atomic OS on your computer while unlocking a world of customization through the cloud native development model.
Truly very happy that Nancy Drew: Mystery Of The Seven Keys is released!
I spent a large portion of last year working on it, and I’m excited to see how all the fans will receive it.
Hoping to catch some of you streamers solve the puzzles, the HeR team really stumped me with some of them!
Yesterday at Red Hat Summit @jorge and @cgwalters presented to a full house of Red Hat employees to walk through the state of atomic / image-based Linux and where we can go from here.
Fedora and Red Hat are looking at what we're doing with bootable containers and are interested in carrying that forward!
Join us on May 24-25 for the Fedora 40 Release Party! It's a user-focused, virtual conference all about what's new and what's coming in Fedora. Come learn about your favorite distro from the people who make it!
I tried installing the proprietary Nvidia driver on this old MacBook that I am installing Ultramarine Linux (Fedora) on, but it nosedived on a reboot, so I removed it, but now SDDM is showing distorted image on a reboot. Once the desktop loads, everything is normal, but SDDM does this.
Anyone from #fedora#atomic images are they all long term supported if not which one is considered LTS? I don't know much about Fedora or its ecosystem. Been mostly debian/ubuntu/arch linux over the decades.
Hey'all! We're BlueBuild, a FOSS community project focused on making the customization of image-based atomic Linux distributions a breeze. (atomic @fedora, @UniversalBlue
The fact that #UniversalBlue exists and provides a valuable service just proves that #Fedora Atomic makes it too hard for sysadmins to customize their installs. Because what they are doing is mostly just changing which packages get installed in the base image.
I'm glad that Fedora 40 includes the new per-wifi profile MAC address, but only realized it when trying to SSH into my laptop and noticed the laptop had a different IP address than the DHCP lease that had been set up.
I'm on #Fedora#Silverblue 40, and I'm now seeing a lot of "No video with supported format and MIME type found" errors.
I don't have mozilla-openh264 installed, so I guess that might make sense? Let's fix that...
# rpm-ostree install mozilla-openh264<br></br>...<br></br>error: Could not depsolve transaction; 1 problem detected:<br></br> Problem: package noopenh264-0.1.0~openh264_2.4.0-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System conflicts with openh264 provided by openh264-2.4.0-2.fc40.x86_64 from fedora-cisco-openh264<br></br> - package openh264-2.4.0-2.fc40.x86_64 from fedora-cisco-openh264 obsoletes noopenh264 < 1:0 provided by noopenh264-0.1.0~openh264_2.4.0-1.fc40.x86_64 from @System<br></br> - package mozilla-openh264-2.4.0-2.fc40.x86_64 from fedora-cisco-openh264 requires openh264(x86-64) = 2.4.0-2.fc40, but none of the providers can be installed<br></br> - conflicting requests<br></br># rpm -qa | grep noopenh264<br></br>noopenh264-0.1.0~openh264_2.4.0-1.fc40.x86_64<br></br># rpm-ostree install --uninstall noopenh264 mozilla-openh264<br></br>error: Package/capability 'noopenh264' is not currently requested<br></br>
There's clearly something I don't understand here. I don't know how noopenh264 is installed but not requested and still causes a conflict. I must be alone in having this problem based on lack of bugs that I can find in RH's bugzilla.
I don't think I saw this problem on Silverblue 39, but I was using that for only a few days before rebasing on 40, and was previously on my "classic" Fedora 39 installation where it definitely wasn't showing up with the rpmfusion packages installed.