My site's firewall informs me that we're now at 1526 blocks of the ChatGPT bot’s attempts to scrape/steal my content to train their plagiarism sauce.
I'll say it again, there is no ethical use of LLMs/“AI”s at this point. You know the ecological devastation, the plagiarism, and the racism. Just don’t use it, even for lulz.
Asking #GPT4All with #Mistral#OpenOrca does give great advice:
"How can we limit the negative consequences of the #climatecrisis without losing all the skeptics?" #AI
Daily Inspiration: "In the race to the future, it's the long game that matters!" - Futurist Jim Carroll
It feels like 1993.
It's a whirlwind with AI; new developments every day, staggering advances, relentless hype, somewhat massive hysteria, and yet real glimpses of something BIG happening.
Each and every day, I've been busy scouring my sources - newsletters,
research services, mailing lists, and social networks - working hard to keep up with the developments in AI. We are probably only a matter of months away before you will be able to download your own personal ChatGPT or equivalent for use on your Mac or Windows machine. You can already do the same type of thing with the Stable Diffusion text-to-image system if you are on a Mac. You are about to be flooded by new ideas that once seemed unimaginable.
And yet, it seems to be moving too fast, like new technology always does. That's why the post Early Days of AI (and AI Hype Cycle) by Elad Gil caught my attention because I'm always ranting about the fact that despite the speed of technology, it often takes a long time for people and organizations to catch up.
This ties in with the approach I'm taking in my talks - something big is going on, but it's going to take some time to unfold.
That's why, when it comes to the future, it's always about the long game!
Ugh -- agreed to speak to a journalist about whether people (actually women in particular, because it's a women's magazine type publication) should use chatbots for health information. I said in no uncertain terms that they should not, but they found someone else to quote too saying it could be beneficial blah blah blah. And then the article ends with a quote from me saying "Don't do this" followed by a "quote" from ChatGPT --- i.e. more synthetic text published as news. Grr.
"How many people have used chatbots for self-diagnosis when they felt sick? For legal or financial advice? How often did they receive incorrect answers?
@ellent no, some opensource models even work on an old laptop (like #GPT4ALL ) , you can also download uncensored models, the cat is out of the bag... You can still punish people for crimes ofcourse but it's hard to prevent misuse of those models.
It's not as good as ChatGPT but as a demonstrator that a model can run on a laptop, for experiments etc i like GPT4ALL. It's easy to install. Also it's opensource both model and data. It doesn't need internet so you can experiment, combine it with your own code etcetera https://gpt4all.io/index.html #AI#opensource#GenerativeAI#LLM#GPT4ALL
Ich habe mal #gpt4all herunterladen und eines der größeren getunten 13B Modelle getestet. Es ist auf jeden Fall langsamer, als #ChatGPT 3.5 zu sehr schlechten Zeiten. Auch wird der Kontext nicht 100% gemerkt. Man muss sich im Prompt immer wiederholen, damit das Modell nicht den Faden verliert.
Aber schon recht gute Ergebnisse, benötigt keine Cloud und es werden keine Daten versendet (wenn man es nicht will).
Aber CPU nutzt es maximal 25%, das wird mit meinen Cores nicht ausgereizt.