SomeGadgetGuy, to tech
@SomeGadgetGuy@techhub.social avatar

A quick check in on the Xiaomi 14, and while this is an awesome camera, it turns out I TOO have issues with condensation and the lens fogging up. Has YOUR Xiaomi suffered similar issues? Has Xiaomi fixed or exchanged your phone?

https://youtube.com/shorts/PHP-lnGapF4?feature=share

maralorn, (edited ) to haskell
@maralorn@chaos.social avatar

After extensively using the library for half a year at work I have now played around with the library again. I am amazed by how much more helpful error messages are with . It’s an amazing library and I would recommend it over whenever you have the choice.

maralorn,
@maralorn@chaos.social avatar

@pmidden Well, they compose with % instead of . which you might find less pretty.

They use an opaque type for optics which is the big selling point but also means you need to depend on optics-core to define compatible optics.

I remember missing one operator from which I found to be quite cool, but I don’t remember which one, so it can’t be that important.

afoolandhisfuji, to Cat
@afoolandhisfuji@c.im avatar
f_dion, to photography
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

One of the rarest Topcon accessory is the UV mount adapter. If you look at a UV mount lens, it has no aperture control ring. Works on a UV mount camera as the camera has an aperture ring on the mount. the other Topcon cameras used the R or RE mount (based on exakta) so they made an adapter. Not that many were sold, or maybe they got discarded as people though it was just random lens parts… at any rate they rarely show up for sale anywhere.

f_dion,
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

So imagine my surprise when i stumbled upon this lens. Looks like an exakta or early tamron adaptamatic lens, then you recognize the silver band and focus ring as Topcon UV topcor. that’s what the seller tells you, based on the beauty ring. But the mount is wrong. Then, 💡

There is a UV adapter mounted on it. But it is stuck and wobbly, possibly damaged. The aperture ring is also stuck. So maybe it wont be of any use… or perhaps i can repair the adapter…

f_dion,
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

After partially disassembling the lens, I was able to free the adapter. No wonder it was wobbly, it was held together with only one of 3 screws. And, I doubt this is original, but there was a o-ring in the sandwich of parts making up the adapter. My guess is that the o-ring was added to compensate for the 2 missing screws, leaving a path for light to enter without it.

The aperture stop spring and bearing was also missing.

f_dion, to Wyze
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

The equalizer.

Not Queen Latifah, just a camera. At launch, the Auto 100 came with a 53mm f2 lens and 2 optional lenses, a wide 35mm f3.5 and a 100mm f4. Not long after that they added a 135mm (a massive affair) and a 200mm f4 (the Topcon RE version was 5.6). With the lauch of the Unirex, they would later add a 28mm for the UV line (wink, uni / auto 100, unirex, ic-1). They are called UV because the glass is coated to block UV, making a uv filter superfluous.

f_dion, to photography
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

The Greek grill by night

A little local restaurant. A few tables and booths.

Shot with my Fujifilm XT-20 and a Tokyo Kogaku topcon RE Auto 35mm 2.8 manual focus lens in Topcor RE mount, adapted with speed booster for a true 35mm field of view and great night time performance.

f_dion, to Leica
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

So far, no other UV Topcor (Topcon) lenses tested positive for thorium. This is a different series of lenses / system than the Topcon RE lenses. They are still high quality but have no built-in aperture control, which helped reduce the cost. low chromatic aberration, nice contrast & sharp. Topcon made lenses for before this.

Cameras for this system include the Auto 100, uni, unirex and IC-1. Pictured below is a 35mm 3.5 with hood on helicoid and 28mm 4.0

teasingtabby, to microscopy
@teasingtabby@pixelfed.social avatar

Microscopic dendrites of sodium hydrogencarbonate a.k.a. baking soda, viewed under a do-it-yourself smartphone-based microscope 🔬 in reflected white light.

Real width of the image is 2.7 mm 📏.

didib, to photography
@didib@swiss.social avatar

Ein , das im Fokusbereich unschlagbar scharf zeichnet und trotzdem ein superweiches, crèmiges liefert, im Bild gleichzeitig aber keine erkennbaren Übergänge bzw. Grenzen von unscharf zu scharf und wieder unscharf klar erkennbar sind? Und obendrein klein, leicht und handlich ist? Ja, das gibt es, und das habe ich mir heute geleistet. 🤩

image/png

f_dion, to photography
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

On a whim, I decided to measure the radiation level of this Tokyo Kogaku (Topcon) lens. It is an unusual lens in that it doesnt have an aperture control ring. There is an aperture mechanism, but if is controlled by the camera (like a Topcon Unirex or Topcon IC-1). It is a sharp lens, but given it was the more affordable line (the RE was 50% more expensive), didn't expect Thorium was used for the lens. Then again, it is a 50mm from the 1960s.

f_dion,
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

Measured at rear element: 5.51uSv/h instant, 5.4 avg. Not background noise. So some front element (there are 6 glass elements in total in this lens) definitely was made with Thorium. It explains the sharpness. Also means I will have to keep it isolated for long term storage, and not on the shelf right next to me... I'll have to check the other Topcon UV lenses...

f_dion,
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

You'll be surprised to know that the relatively common Fujinon 55mm f2.2 in m42 (fujica st) is also radioactive. I know I was, as that has never been identified before, AFAIK. This is without EBC coating, just regular coating. Front shows 13.64 instant, 13.2 avg. Btw, that is not insignificant.

f_dion, to Japan
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

Does anyone have a picture of Japan’s first digital computer, the FUJiC? It is on exposition at the National Science Museum in Tokyo. Looking for a good picture with a straightforward CC license.

The research to design the computer started in 1949, and manufacturing started in 1952. Photographic lenses were designed based on the computations staring in 1956.

f_dion, to photography
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

Over 10 years ago, this weird little plastic lens came on the market. For Nikon and Canon. I used the Nikon version with my Nikon F3 and Fujifilm S3 Pro. It was the Holga Lens Turret. A pinhole camera with 2 removable turrets for special effects. It wasn't on the market that long, it's a shame cause it is fun. They never made one for Fuji X but that is not stopping me from trying it out on the X-T5 using a Nikon AI to Fuji X adapter.

f_dion,
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

And here it is with the effect filter turret installed.

f_dion,
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

And here is an example picture using the pinhole lens, no additional effect.

Picture taken at 6400 iso and 1/30. Still dark due to pinhole aperture being really small, like 1:64 I'm guessing. Still, gave it the look I wanted, like an old oil painting

f_dion, to photography
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

This is a branded Porst, a german photo retailer & mail order company that no longer exists. I’m hoping that someone might have some insight on who might have manufactured this lens. It is a 24mm f3.5: multi coated, with a AX mount, for CR1 CR3 CR5 and CR7 cameras, and fuji AX1, AX3, AX5 and STX cameras. Says “lens japan” but not made by Fuji. Fuji had a 24mm 2.8. Porst had a few rebranded fuji like the 50mm 1.2.

Any idea who made this one?

petersuber, to microsoft
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Grr. error messages are STILL NOT copy/pasteable. This jacks up the difficulty of getting tech support or running web searches. (I know the problem goes way beyond MS.)

My workaround is to photograph my screen with an phone and use to turn the image into text — and savor being saved by Android, saved by , and saved by the .

But no workarounds should be needed. All error messages should be copy/pasteable unless the error blocks copying/pasting.

f_dion, to photography
@f_dion@mastodon.online avatar

Speaking of photographic lens filters, what are your favorite brands? Favorite types?

itnewsbot, to random
@itnewsbot@schleuss.online avatar

A 3D Printed Grinder for Printed Lens Blanks - When one thinks of applications for 3D printing, optical components don’t seem to ... - https://hackaday.com/2023/11/16/a-3d-printed-grinder-for-printed-lens-blanks/

stshank, to photography
@stshank@mstdn.social avatar

Sigma has a new 70-200mm f2.8 Sports series lens. Looks solid. $1500, for mirrorless Sony & Leica cameras. I like Sigma — an earlier 70-200 was my introduction to the company, and 35mm f1.4 is great. Too bad Canon hasn't opened up RF lens mount to 3rd parties. https://www.sigma-global.com/en/lenses/s023_70_200_28/

Bristow_69, to sport French
@Bristow_69@framapiaf.org avatar

Écouter l'entraîneur de RC Lens sur Stade2 donnerait presque envie d'aller voir un match de foot avec .

Cela semble être un chic type, loin de ce que l'on peut voir dans ce (suffit de voir ce qu'il s'est passé à Marseille ce soir).

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • provamag3
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • osvaldo12
  • khanakhh
  • slotface
  • tacticalgear
  • InstantRegret
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • everett
  • rosin
  • JUstTest
  • Durango
  • GTA5RPClips
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • mdbf
  • cisconetworking
  • Leos
  • normalnudes
  • cubers
  • megavids
  • tester
  • anitta
  • lostlight
  • All magazines