MaryAustinBooks, to thailand
@MaryAustinBooks@mstdn.social avatar

Wow! Congratulations to for taking a giant step towards marriage equality! A bill legalizing same sex marriage has passed their Parliament by an overwhelming margin. It still has to pass the Senate and receive royal approval, but it is expected to be law this year.


https://www.telegraph.co.uk/global-health/climate-and-people/thailand-same-sex-marriage-lgbtq-legislation-asia/

br00t4c, to DaftPunk
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar

Lawmakers in Thailand overwhelmingly approve a bill to legalize same-sex marriage (apnews.com)

Lawmakers in Thailand’s lower house of Parliament have overwhelmingly approved a marriage equality bill hat would make the country the first in Southeast Asia to legalize equal rights for marriage partners of any gender. The bill passed its final reading with the approval of 400 of the 415 members of the House of...

emmaaum, (edited ) to thailand
@emmaaum@zirk.us avatar

lower house passes legislation!!!!! 400 for, out of 415 present, with only 10 opposed. Support from all major parties.

There are still steps to go before it actually becomes law but the landslide means it can't be overturned.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-68672318

https://www.bangkokpost.com/thailand/general/2766178/house-passes-landmark-marriage-equality-bill

https://www.thaienquirer.com/51980/marriage-equality-in-thailand/


@BlandGLdramas

Kon, to greece
@Kon@aus.social avatar

The first same - sex couple to be married in the Athens Town Hall since passed . How special and beautiful ❤️😍

CultureDesk, (edited ) to DadBin
@CultureDesk@flipboard.social avatar

In America, married people get more than 1,000 legal benefits that single people can't access. Vox's Sigal Samuel asks why people in a platonic partnership can't enjoy the same kind of benefits, and why society values friendships less than familial relationships and marriages. Do you have a "best friend?"

https://flip.it/a-tsW0

CultureDesk,
@CultureDesk@flipboard.social avatar

Aw, 50% of poll respondents say that their romantic partner is their best friend — with the rest of the respondents sharing the love for their one bestie, group of pals or family members. Will the U.S. (or other places) ever recognize friendship as a valid relationship worthy of legal status? Here's a story from Slate about Colorado's Designated Beneficiary Agreements, which recognize and protect relationships of all stripes, and which writer and law professor John Culhane says should be expanded and exported. "Great triumph though it was, marriage equality left too many people out of its embrace. It’s time to change that," he writes.

https://flip.it/r_lQIZ

#Marriage #Relationships #Lifestyle #Partnerships #Friendship #MarriageEquality

yazad3, to LGBT
@yazad3@techhub.social avatar

Hi Fedi Family,
In 2008 Californians voted for Prop8 that defined marriage as the union of one man and one woman in the California constitution. While this was defeated in courts this draconian Prop8 language is still in the California constitution. Justice tHomas and the right wing SCOTUS is openly hinting at destroying precedent and trampling rights. If they overturned Obergefell - the Prop8 language in the California Constitution will act as a “trigger law”, raining havoc on queer families like mine across California.
Please spread the word to vote “YES” to repeal Prop8 (2008) from the California constitution in Nov 2024. Talk to your friends, family and colleagues about it.

Boosts appreciated.

https://ballotpedia.org/California_Right_to_Marry_and_Repeal_Proposition_8_Amendment_(2024)

prismnpen, to LGBTQ
@prismnpen@stranger.social avatar

This essay deals with how from a very early age people unknowingly and unthinkingly accept negative beliefs that affect everyday views and interactions with life, how we perceive and accept others, and how these views, developed over many years, can make change take place so slowly!
https://medium.com/prismnpen/what-same-sex-marriage-being-legalized-in-greece-can-teach-us-c65f58f71bff?sk=77b4d65b87c6a9fd52af1f4931a1756d

wdlindsy, to Marriage
@wdlindsy@toad.social avatar

"The Alabama Supreme Court’s attack on in vitro fertilization (IVF), a pair of attacks on marriage equality, and the attack on Nex Benedict in Oklahoma and their death the next day all emerge from the ideology of, devices employed by, and cases decided by this Supreme Court majority.

We ignore their connections and danger at the peril of all who do not want this to become our national reality."

~ Chris Geidner

https://www.lawdork.com/p/dobbs-ivf-marriage-nex

BruceMirken, to Marriage
@BruceMirken@mas.to avatar

The radical right majority is coming for (and more, no doubt). https://www.commondreams.org/news/alito-2667332214

br00t4c, to Marriage
@br00t4c@mastodon.social avatar
Susan_Larson_TN, to thailand
@Susan_Larson_TN@mastodon.online avatar
RonaldTooTall, to LGBTQ

Nepal registers its historic first same-sex marriage.

It is the first South Asian country to recognize a same-sex marriage.

https://www.lgbtqnation.com/2023/11/nepal-registers-its-historic-first-same-sex-marriage/

RonaldTooTall, to LGBTQ
Jedigirl, to feminism
indianewswatch, to Marriage
@indianewswatch@kolektiva.social avatar

Same-sex verdict compels queer couples to lead dishonest lives, review petition tells Supreme Court

‘No contract or forceful State action can curtail an adult’s fundamental right to marry,’ the review petition said.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/same-sex-verdict-compels-queer-couples-to-lead-dishonest-lives-review-petition-tells-supreme-court/article67492566.ece

EndemicEarthling, to queensland
@EndemicEarthling@todon.eu avatar

In May, the Liberal-National opposition provided bipartisan support for legislation establishing a 3-4 year process, as a necessary precursor to the (extremely belated) negotiation of a treaty or with Aboriginal & Torres Strait Islander peoples. And they did so in response to the (that had called for , and ).

At the time, opposition leader had personally encouraged people in his state to "embrace this [truth-telling] wholeheartedly". On the day the legislation passed, he said: "I believe in truth-telling and to me that means telling it like it is. […] We cannot shy away from the real experiences of Australians throughout history. We must tell the truth about the real challenges they are facing today."

But now, five months later yet before any of the formal processes of truth-telling have begun, he's withdrawn support for the legislation, promising to tear it up should his party be voted into government at the next election.

He claims he is doing so because he is listening—to the voices of the 'No' voters, who outnumbered the 'Yes' voters at last Saturday's .

1/3

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2023/oct/19/queensland-treaty-qld-premier-annastacia-palaszczuk-lnp-backflip-indigenous-first-nations-truth-telling

EndemicEarthling,
@EndemicEarthling@todon.eu avatar

By reneging on their previous support for truth-telling, the Queensland are also showing they don't really respect the voters they claim to be acting on behalf of.

The wasn't about -telling or (despite the No campaign's various fear-mongering attempts to hypothesize all kinds of treaty outcomes). It was about .

Qld LNP have decided that when voters said "No" to Voice, what they really meant was no to Voice+Truth+Treaty.

(Imagine the bemusement at LNP HQ if had responded to the resounding 'Yes' in the 2018 postal survey on by saying "what voters have really said here is that they think marriage has been too restrictive, so we're going to introduce legislation for marriages"...)

Constitutional legal theory typically embraces the argument that constitutional (rather than merely legislative) protections are necessary to prevent a vulnerable minority from having their rights and basic wellbeing undermined by the desires of the majority. This decision by Qld LNP is an excellent illustration of that very phenomenon (the preferences of the majority trumping the plight of the minority), and so a confirmation of why Indigenous peoples were asking for a constitutional Voice in the first place.

3/3

myeyesaredim, to LGBTQ

"Queerness is a natural phenomenon known to India since ancient times," said Chief Justice DY Chandrachud.

Justice SK Kaul added: "The significant aspect is that same-sex unions were recognised in antiquity, not simply as unions that facilitate sexual activity, but as relationships that foster love, emotional support and mutual care."

But British overturned that history by introducing Victorian ideals of heterosexual monogamy.

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-67131106

indianewswatch, to Marriage
@indianewswatch@kolektiva.social avatar

SC Doesn't Legalise Marriage Equality, 2 of 5 Judges Says Queer Couples Must Be Given Legal Rights

A total of four judgments are being delivered, with "a degree of agreement and a degree of disagreement," the CJI said.

https://thewire.in/law/marriage-equality-supreme-court-decision

prismnpen, to LGBTQ
@prismnpen@stranger.social avatar

When Moms for Suppression goes after Anne Frank, the world doesn’t just tilt, it flips and for many of us, it will never be set right again.
https://medium.com/prismnpen/kids-should-be-free-to-read-books-with-gay-characters-c411df7ff12f?sk=e18aeb8a31fdc37f5651d10c07a222c6

Susan_Larson_TN, to gay
@Susan_Larson_TN@mastodon.online avatar
tallandtrue, to Marriage
@tallandtrue@aus.social avatar

My hope is that Australians will show the same fair-go support for peoples and the as we did for in 2017! ❤️

pluralistic, to random
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Anything that can't go on forever will eventually stop. 40 years of declining worker power shattered the American Dream (TM), producing multiple generations whose children fared worse than their parents, cratering faith in institutions and hope for a better future.

--

If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read or share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

https://pluralistic.net/2023/09/14/prop-22-never-again/#norms-code-laws-markets

1/

pluralistic,
@pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

Larry @lessig once laid out a theory of change that holds that our society is governed by four forces: (what's legal), (what's socially acceptable), (what's profitable) and (what's technologically possible):

https://cs.stanford.edu/people/eroberts/cs181/projects/2010-11/CodeAndRegulation/about.html

These four forces interact. When queer relationships were normalized, it made it easier to legalize them, too - and then the businesses that became both a force for more normalization and legal defense.
25/

Lukas, to Marriage
@Lukas@aus.social avatar

We in the + communities endured a lot of homophobia and vile bigotry during the Australian postal vote in 2017. However, it almost pales in significance to the unrelenting racist, xenophobic, vitriolic attacks, lies and disinformation towards Australian First Nations' peoples coming from the 'No' voters in the

Not only is it coming from the usual rabble of racists, bots and trolls - but being led by Peter Dutton who has stripped any sense of dignity from the opposition party.

Whatever the outcome of this vote, Australia has to face up to its apparent endemic racism.

Susan_Larson_TN, to legal
@Susan_Larson_TN@mastodon.online avatar

For in .

A new shows increasing support among for legalizing with 37 percent for it, 42 percent against it, and about 22 percent undecided.

https://www.kyivpost.com/post/21040

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines