Welche Frage des @ZDF hier angemessen gewesen wäre:
„Jenny, Sie sind weiß, jung, gut aussehend, dauergrinsed im Service. Auf welcher Datenbasis wurden diese Parameter zugeteilt? Und welche Stereotype werden mit dieser Auswahl verstärkt?“
➡️ die unkritische Befragung einer KI, ohne die angemessene, nein: notwendige journalistische Einordnung dieser genannten Sachverhalte
Statt einer unterhaltsamen PR-Veranstaltung für #ChatGPT hätte dieses einseitige Format mindestens der soliden Einordnung einer Expertin, eines Experten bedurft.
@rikefranke
But why, o why, I ask?
What value does a bullshit generator add to the discussion? What gain do media get from this incessant free ads for commercial entities?
Ik ging vandaag nog even verder met mijn eigen test van ChatGPT.
Ik stelde #ethische en #maatschappelijk vragen en daarnaast een aantal vragen over #sciencefiction, bijvoorbeeld de 3 wetten van de Robitica die Isaac Asimov al in 1950 formuleerde.
Ik werd prettig verrast. Ja ChatGPT kende die en ja, hij/zij wordt zo #geprogammeerd en is zich bewust van dat soort vragen.
..hen gewoon een gesprek voeren. Het probleem herkent AI feilloos. Wij mensen dienen kritisch te blijven op de informatie die AI ons geeft. AI is #geprogrammeerd om informatie te zoeken op je vraag, niet om beslissingen te nemen. Dat moet je nog steeds zelf doen.
#ChatGPT is niet het gevaar, het gevaar is dat wij niet meer zelf nadenken.
En verder is het gevaar dat commerciële partijen dit gaan misbruiken voor hun eigen belang.
• Generative AI models learn from mass data scraped from web
• Indigenous groups fear losing control over their data
• Some move to protect their information from commercial use
"When U.S. tech firm OpenAI rolled out Whisper, a speech recognition tool offering audio transcription and translation into English for dozens of languages including Māori, it rang alarm bells for many Indigenous New Zealanders.
"Whisper, launched in September by the company behind the ChatGPT chatbot, was trained on 680,000 hours of audio from the web, including 1,381 hours of the Māori language."
With the advent of building sites, apps, and writing code via #ChatGPT, it seems like there could be some form of compendium to contain the growing number of conversations that can be used as a guide to engage with the AI effectively. I broke out my exact conversation with ChatGPT when building the AI-only site, and anyone can use my script to get them on the right track! https://marconius.com/chattySite.htmlhttps://marconius.com/chattySite_convo.html
#AI#GenerativeAI#LLMs#ChatGPT#PromptEngineering#Programming#SoftwareDevelopment: "So: ChatGPT proves to be a useful tool, and no doubt a tool that will get better over time. It will make developers who learn how to use it well more effective; 25 to 50% is nothing to sneeze at. But using ChatGPT effectively is definitely a learned skill. It isn’t going to take away anyone’s job. It may be a threat to people whose jobs are about performing a single task repetitively, but that isn’t (and has never been) the way programming works. Programming is about applying skills to solve problems. If a job needs to be done repetitively, you use your skills to write a script and automate the solution. ChatGPT is just another step in this direction: it automates looking up documentation and asking questions on StackOverflow. It will quickly become another essential tool that junior programmers will need to learn and understand. (I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s already being taught in “boot camps.”)"
#ChatGPT and #GenerativeAI is great but when we're celebrating it used as a replacement for therapy or companionship we shouldn't be mad at tech, but rather the American healthcare system that put us in the situation in the first place.
#ChatGPT may be a glorified Markov-chain system, but the results it produces are impressive nonetheless. The reason may be that it discovered the patterns of human thought.
One question to ask product teams or execs that are awed with LLM integrations:
"What are you trying to achieve that you couldn't solve 6 months ago?"
It's a great starting point to refocus the conversation on the outcomes and not the solution. LLMs might be part of that outcome but they shouldn't be the starting point.
Sehr grober Unfug, den das #ZDF heute journal beim "Interview mit einer #KI" verzapft hat. Journalismus sollte Text-Generatoren gerade nicht vermenschlichen, sondern sachlich entzaubern, und auf keinen Fall eine Science-Fiction-Show daraus machen. Mit Gesicht, Stimme und Darstellung von #ChatGPT als Interviewgast machen die Kolleg*innen meiner Ansicht nach alles falsch. #AI
‘The Godfather of A.I.’ Leaves Google and Warns of Danger Ahead
His immediate concern is that the internet will be flooded with false photos, videos and text, and the average person will “not be able to know what is true anymore.”
Down the road, he is worried that future versions of the technology pose a threat to humanity because they often learn unexpected behavior from the vast amounts of data they analyze. This becomes an issue, he said, as individuals and companies allow A.I. systems not only to generate their own computer code but actually run that code on their own. And he fears a day when truly autonomous weapons — those killer robots — become reality.
"I console myself with the normal excuse: If I hadn’t done it, somebody else would have," said Hinton, who had been employed by Google for more than a decade. "It is hard to see how you can prevent the bad actors from using it for bad things."