Robert Jenrick, who has got his Adolph underpants on, says to #BBCLauraK, "I do support pulling out of the European Court of Human Rights."
Chakrabarti reminds him that the #ECHR has protected British people from abuses by its own government, and there are currently interim measures in relation to Putin's Russia preventing Ukranian prisoners of war from being executed
[She doesn't say because she is interrupted by Jenrick, that it was the UK that first evoked these measures.]
The good news:
Shabana Mahmood, the Labour shadow justice secretary has come out forcefully in support of the ECHR....
The bad news:
Shabana Mahmood, the Labour shadow justice secretary thinks the solution to the UK prison problem is to build more prisons....
And while she is right, 'Change will not happen overnight... We cannot wave a magic wand & return our legal system to its former glory'... lets hope at least the mood music will change quickly!
NEW PODCAST: A rare example of happy climate news in this week's episode! We're talking about the victory of 2000 older Swiss women who took their government to the European Court of Human Rights demanding more action on climate change.
Yes!
UK trade union law breaches workers' human rights as it does not protect them from sanctions short of dismissal for taking part in industrial action, the Supreme Court ruled today.
"The right of an employer to impose any sanction at all short of dismissal for participation in lawful industrial action nullifies the right to take lawful strike action," Judge Ingrid Simler said in the court's written ruling. #TradeUnions#Unison#WorkersRights#HumanRights#ECHR#UK
I think what Nige means is "big thanks to the lefty human rights lawyers who went to an elitist court to uphold my right to free association under the ECHR".
Talk among Tories of leaving the ECHR is reaching fever pitch (again), so its as well to be reminded about what the consequences of leaving the European Convention on Human Rights would & wouldn't be.
Whatever the practical issues, as Joelle Grogan (King's College) concludes, not only would it encourage further withdrawals, leaving the ECHR would be one more element in the destruction of the UK's (already floundering) global reputation, with further consequences.
Fantastic news yesterday that the #KlimaSeniorinnen have won the first #climate case victory at the European Court of Human Rights. We made an podcast last year about this epic battle, challenging the idea that climate #activism is for young people.
The European Convention on Human Rights "encompasses a right to effective protection by the State authorities from the serious adverse effects of climate change".
The Swiss government "failed to comply with its duties", including its failure "to quantify, through a carbon budget or otherwise, national greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions limitations", and "to meet its past GHG emission reduction targets".
Today’s landmark rulings by the European Court of Human Rights confirm that #climatechange poses existential risks for humankind impacting on #HumanRights and that states are obliged to act to fight it. They give victims clarity on the way forward in protecting their rights. #ECHR
He's cracked it! Put him in charge of the election campaign immediately 😂
Jake Berry (in an interview with Sky News) says of course we should leave the ECHR because Canada and Australia aren't members and they're doing just fine. 🙄
@fkamiah17 remind Sunak and friends that that "foreign" court (the #echr ) was created by the 1949 Treaty of London! UK withdrawal would be a disgrace, making our government a laughing stock, joining the 1970 Greek dictatorship.
A caller to #LBC on the subject of James Cleverly depicting the regular peace protests in London as "Mob Rule" starts with "I believe in the right to peaceful protest..."
There is of course a But: "But if the demonstrators are breaking the law..."
Nick Ferrari interrupts: "But they're not [breaking the law] are they - THAT'S THE PROBLEM..."
Anyone else get the feeling Nick's support for the right to protest is conditional on who you are?
They don't even need to be autocrats - any democratic constitution that grants majoritarian power to a minority (like Boris Johnson's 80 seat majority on 44% of the vote) has the right to pass Bad Law that is perfectly legal except...
Except when an overarching law like the #HRA or #ECHR allows the courts to judge Bad Law as unlawful.
The Nastiz get this - this is why they wanted to leave the EU (to nullify the ECFR) and why they want to abrogate the ECHR and HRA.
Encryption ensures the enjoyment of fundamental rights such as privacy and freedom of expression, the judgment reads, while helping citizens and businesses to defend themselves against abuses of information technologies. Hence, the ruling to outlaw legislations that could open up backdoors for criminals to exploit.
The decision was welcomed with enthusiasm by privacy experts that have long called the EU Commission to withdraw their CSAM-scanning proposal, known as Chat Control, which planned to enable authorities to scan all citizens' private communications to halt the spread of dangerous content."
In a case involving Telegram vs Russia, European Court of Human Rights decides that the right to (messaging) privacy is inviolable, thus also siding with the EU Parliament who opposed the Commission's plan to ban unbreakable end to end encryption. This should end that particular proposion for good.