dw_innovation, to llm
@dw_innovation@mastodon.social avatar

As negotiate with companies that have built , they are starting to think about how to assign a dollar to their .

There are three parts to this problem:

  1. Understanding what can be licensed
  2. Setting a price
  3. Getting the companies to agree to pay

Interesting article by Anya Schiffrin for Poynter: https://www.poynter.org/reporting-editing/2024/google-search-ai-effect-news-publishers-deals/

richard, to Pubtips
@richard@disabled.social avatar
fight, to books
@fight@fightforthefuture.org avatar

Tomorrow, @internetarchive will file their reply brief in the suit from major to end the right of IA and all to own and preserve -free digital .

Reading what they’re replying to, we’ve gotta ask:

Who is the real “Napster” here?

A thread.

NatureMC, to ai
@NatureMC@mastodon.online avatar

Every time, you think it couldn't get any worse, a new revelation tops it off. As an author, I wonder how long it will take for the book market to be completely enshittified.
Thank you for the ! ⬆️ @writers @bookstodon

books

melikhovo, to Pubtips
@melikhovo@zirk.us avatar

Here's a list of publishers distributed by SPD until SPD closed down, erased their website, and ceased communication. Supporting small presses directly right now could be the difference for them between survival and not.

https://www.clmp.org/news/presses-previously-distributed-by-spd/

@bookstodon

kimlockhartga, to books
@kimlockhartga@beige.party avatar

@bookstodon Hey, I love me some Penguin Random House as much as the next reader, but I'm also interested in the indies, which are usually more daring than the Big Five.

Favorite indie publishers? Please add to my list:

Two Dollar Radio
Bluemoose
Unnamed Press
Coffeehouse
Small Beer
Graywolf
Catapult
Driftwood
Black Spot
Future Tense
Copper Canyon
Tin House
Dzanc
Melville House
Quirk
Blackwater
Red Hen
City Lights
Algonquin
Black Rose
Hellbound
Wakefield
Fledgling

#bookstodon #books #indie #publishers

mike, to random
@mike@sauropods.win avatar

Why do exist?

They exists to make publications: to make things public. It's right there in the name.

But "publishers" as they exist now have the exact opposite mission. Their business model is to PREVENT things from being public — as in this iniquitous lawsuit: https://www.theverge.com/2023/3/24/23655804/internet-archive-hatchette-publisher-ebook-library-lawsuit

So. I will never again knowingly buy any book "published" by Hachette, HarperCollins, John Wiley & Sons or Penguin Random House. I won't give my money to content-hoarding corporations.

stina_marie, to Horror
@stina_marie@horrorhub.club avatar

List of (with their websites) that do NOT use AI (continued 2/4 )

Brigids Gate Press
https://brigidsgatepress.com/

Cemetery Gates Media
https://cemeterygatesmedia.com/

Clash Books
https://www.clashbooks.com/

Crossroad Press
https://crossroadpress.com/

Cursed Morsels Press
https://www.cursedmorselspress.com/

Encyclopocalypse Publications
https://www.encyclopocalypse.com/

Filthy Loot Press
https://www.filthyloot.com/

Ghoulish
https://ghoulish.rip/

@horror @horrorbooks @bookstodon

stina_marie, to Horror
@stina_marie@horrorhub.club avatar

List of (with their websites) that do NOT use AI (continued 3/4 )

Hungry Shadow Press
https://www.hungryshadowpress.com/

Jackanapes Press
https://www.jackanapespress.com/

Malarkey Books
https://malarkeybooks.com/home

Midworld Press
https://www.midworldpress.com/

Neon Hemlock
https://www.neonhemlock.com/books

PS Publishing
https://pspublishing.co.uk/

Shortwave Publishing
https://shop.shortwavepublishing.com/

Subterranean Press
https://subterraneanpress.com/

@horror @horrorbooks @bookstodon

stina_marie, to Horror
@stina_marie@horrorhub.club avatar

List of (with their websites) that do NOT use AI (continued 4/4 )

Tenebrous Press
https://tenebrous-press.square.site/

Thunderstorm Books
https://thunderstormbooks.com/thunderstorm/

Underland Press
https://www.underlandpress.com/

Undertow Publications
https://undertowpublications.com/

Valancourt Books
https://www.valancourtbooks.com/

Weirdpunk books
https://www.weirdpunkbooks.com/

Word Horde
https://wordhorde.com/

@horror @horrorbooks @bookstodon

appassionato, to books
@appassionato@mastodon.social avatar

The Israeli army destroyed and burned down the publishing house and library of Al-Kalima in the Sheikh Radwan neighbourhood in Gaza on Feb 19.

https://twitter.com/malsaafin/status/1759675611621073127

@palestine



petersuber, to random
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

From @newrambler:
" have long espoused their opposition to and commitment to the belief that “free people read freely,” but their response to has primarily consisted of one-time donations and statements on their websites…While the publishing industry has mostly endorsed the part of freely that means 'unimpeded by ideological constraints,' it has been much less supportive of the part that means 'without undue economic burden.'"
https://truthout.org/articles/e-books-can-subvert-book-bans-but-corporate-profit-seeking-stands-in-the-way/

noellemitchell, to journalism
@noellemitchell@mstdn.social avatar

Closure announcement from a small press. 😞 One of the reasons they're shutting down is the high number of AI generated submissions they're receiving.

"Just over the weekend, I rejected twenty obviously AI generated submissions. My inbox is flooded with it.

Meanwhile, Amazon and other ebook retails are pushing full-steam ahead to promote AI-generated content at the expense of real authors and artists."

https://www.bardsandsages.com/closure-announcement.html

petersuber, to academia
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

"On Feb. 6, Colorado State University Faculty Council passed a resolution to endorse the CSU Libraries’ licensing priorities."
https://source.colostate.edu/faculty-council-endorses-csu-libraries-licensing-priorities/

PS: I just added the CSU resolution to the crowd-sourced list of institutional principles for negotiating with publishers.
https://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Institutional_principles_for_negotiating_with_publishers


@academicchatter

petersuber, to random
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

I'm grateful to authors who take the time to write up their stories of mistreatment by and .

The publicity can help in their own cases. It can help unknown authors who didn't have the same freedom to publicize their experience. It can help raise standards in publishing.

Here's on the shabby and unprofessional behavior he faced from the journal, 𝘪𝘯 𝘗𝘴𝘺𝘤𝘩𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘺.
https://www.bobuttl.net/2024/02/12/when-did-a-rejection-of-an-already-accepted-article-become-a-thing/

KOKEdit, to DigitalNomadHub
@KOKEdit@mastodon.social avatar

Why do some of and for think they should not themselves and set and ? Humans are not robots. They can only do so much work each day. Stand up for yourself!

technews, to ai

»A growing number of #publishers are asking #translators to work from an #AI-processed version of the original text. Translators find themselves faced with less attractive financial conditions.« https://www.lemonde.fr/en/economy/article/2024/02/04/literary-translators-early-casualties-of-the-ai-revolution_6491526_19.html?eicker.news #tech #media

deevybee, to science
@deevybee@mastodon.social avatar

lots more on papermills bribing editors here, by the indefatigable Nick Wise
https://forbetterscience.com/2024/01/31/welcome-agent-cooperate-with-us/

petersuber, (edited ) to random
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

I don't like the publishing contract from the 𝘑𝘰𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘢𝘭 𝘰𝘧 𝘊𝘰𝘮𝘮𝘶𝘯𝘪𝘤𝘢𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴 𝘢𝘯𝘥 𝘕𝘦𝘵𝘸𝘰𝘳𝘬𝘴 (published by the Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences and the Communications Society). But I do like the fact that the journal made it OA. That helps authors decide whether to submit work there, and supports easier comparison to other contracts. All journals should make their publishing contracts OA.
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=10387284

petersuber, (edited ) to random
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

More evidence that as increase, submissions at APC-based journals do not decrease. know this and profit from the price inelasticity by raising APCs.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11192-024-04934-3

These journals still compete for authors. But for authors submitting to journals, impact metrics matter more than price. For authors submitting to journals, turnaround time matters more than price.

petersuber, to Bulgaria
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

Kudos to for adopting reforms.
https://digrep.bg/en/copyright/bulgaria-implemented-the-copyright-directive-of-2019/

h/t @MelissaHagemann

The Bulgarian reforms include (), which let scholarly authors make their research articles through repositories () without regard to the contracts they might have signed with .

By my count, 9 European countries have adopted SPR. But Bulgaria and Spain are the only two that allow unembargoed green OA.

petersuber, to indonesia
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

New study. Among new journals (launched 2011-2020), most of the or no-APC journals are published by " in countries that are not home to large commercial (, , and ), all with government subsidies."
https://informationr.net/infres/article/view/466

conspirator0, to random
@conspirator0@newsie.social avatar

None of these people exist, but you can buy their books on Amazon anyway. Here's an article on Amazon authors with GAN-generated faces and the books these authors publish (which appear to be almost entirely devoid of original human-created content).

https://conspirator0.substack.com/p/none-of-these-people-exist-but-you

NatureMC,
@NatureMC@mastodon.online avatar

@conspirator0 If the content is AI-generated, it's nearly "fine". But what happens if these fictional authors and AI persons scrape copyrighted, original writer's content? In music it already happens: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/13/business/music-streaming-fraud-spotify.html?unlocked_article_code=1.Nk0.qalW.jORz-iUdrsVy&smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare
BTW, the problem with doesn't exist only on Amazon but also in Science!
@writers

SamUpstate, to random
@SamUpstate@bluelupine.social avatar

As a life-long fan of the Narnia Chronicles (and C. S. Lewis in general, misogyny and racism aside), it vexes me inordinately that all new editions of the Chronicles are published in chronological order, rather than in the order in which they were written (and were obviously intended to be read).

Does anyone know why?

petersuber, to OpenAI
@petersuber@fediscience.org avatar

From Jeff Pooley: "One near-term consequence of the the [ against and ] may be a shift in the big ’ approach to . The companies are already updating their licenses and terms to forbid commercial training —for anyone but them, of course. The companies could also pull back from OA altogether, to keep a larger share of exclusive content to mine."
https://upstream.force11.org/large-language-publishing/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • thenastyranch
  • magazineikmin
  • tacticalgear
  • khanakhh
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • everett
  • ngwrru68w68
  • Durango
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • cisconetworking
  • ethstaker
  • osvaldo12
  • modclub
  • normalnudes
  • provamag3
  • tester
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • lostlight
  • All magazines