Although I'm broadly against so much of what happens with #OpenAI and #ChatGPT I watched some of the new #Figure demos and felt, for the first time, like a man living in the future he imagined as a child.
I think what I find most offensive about the whole discussion I had earlier was the use of #AI to flood the discussion with autogenerated drivel that the other wanted me to put time and effort into.
It makes me really, really angry.
And I think this will become much more common soon enough. Can't find any argument? Just generate 10 responses you didn't put any effort into. Drown out the other voice.
What is their opinion against your skill to open #chatgpt?
It's insane that I can have a conversation with this thing and in a few moments and a few back and forths build a working program in a language I know nothing about (I don't know Go)… don't tell me this isn't huge 😳 #golang#chatgpt
#autocorrect auto-incorrected "lips" into "libs" and now I'm offended that my iPhone took the right word and changed it to a trending pejorative that people might apply to me, a pejorative I'd never type out myself.
A human would know better, but an #AI? Ugh! Keep this in mind if you are ever beguiled into using "tools" like #chatGpt. (I'd never stoop so low.)
Google has dominated the search market for more than two decades, accounting for as much as 90% of all global searches. But OpenAI could be about to take on Google at its own game, with the launch of a new search engine based on ChatGPT tech.
Rumors began when a domain name and security certificate for search.chatgpt.com was found, with an AI influencer later hinting an announcement was coming on 9 May. Here’s more from Tom's Guide.
Thinking is so yesterday, our machine will do it for you!
“Writing a paper the old-fashioned way is not going to be the thing. Using the tool to best discover and express, to communicate ideas, I think that’s where things are going to go in the future.”
Doctor Fantastic’s Amazing Incredible Ideas Unguent On Sale Now!
Prominent academic publishers agreed that #ChatGPT and Co. should not be listed as the author of a scientific paper, as AI is not responsible for the content. Did everyone listen? We conducted a search in WoS and Scopus and found 14 papers with ChatGPT as the "author":
Argh... reviewing a colleague's python code, and he's used ChatGPT or Copilot or some other AI "helper" to write a bunch of the code. And it's just got a load of "Why the hell have you done this?" bits. Especially in the unit tests - it really doesn't know how to write pytest tests.
If you don't know what you're doing it looks halfway reasonable, and it kind-of-sort-of works, but... you'd never write that code if you were doing it yourself.
Teamkollege hat sich die einzigen #Bücher zu einem Fachthema im #Buchhandel als Print-on-Demand bestellt. Was ankam, war nicht nur verschnitten, litt an ausgewaschenem Druckbild und entbehrte jeglicher Gliederung, nein, die Texte waren auch 100% #KI-Erzeugt und völlig inhaltsleerer #Fake.
Angeblich habe der Autor „Rob Botwright“ (🤔) in einem halben Jahr 80 Bücher von Pascal-Programmierung über IT-Sicherheit bis Stringtheorie bei „Pastor Publishing Ltd.“ veröffentlicht.