4 Tools to Share Large Files Over the Internet Securely
These are privacy respecting tools to consider. But what signifies as a big file? Any file that you cannot seem to send through an encrypted messaging app like Signal or Telegram’s secret chat. Ideally, it should be anything more than 1 GB.
#fedipower Liebe alle, brauche eure Hilfe: Was ist ein datenschutzfreundliches Tool um Fotos und Videos als Gruppe online aufzubewahren und zu teilen? Möglichst benutzerfreundlich und nicht zu teuer? Also eine Dropbox mit genug Speicher, gutem Datenschutz und Servern in der EU. Ich bin IT affin, aber kein professioneller IT-ler, selber nen Server hosten ist evtl. zu viel gefragt... #webhosting#fotos#videos#onlinespeicher#filesharing
3D illustration for a 2004 issue of the Dutch ComputerTotaal magazine, about file sharing, which was still commonly done on physical media back then. 📀🙂
Syncthing and other similar software are great, but sometimes you just want a simple, lightweight, and fast way to mirror things, specially if the remote and/or local machines have limited resources.
Here is my ultra minimalistic set and forget (I hope) 2-in-1 rsync based mirror script that can be used in a cron and called manually at the same time. If there is a problem with the transfer, you even get an email.
Kennt jemand von euch ein Programm, dass den Austausch von grossen Dateien plattformübergreifend von Client zu Client über eine direkte, verschlüsselte Verbindung ermöglicht, ohne dass man sich manuell um #VPN, #SSH Tunnel oder ähnliches kümmern muss?
Ein bisschen wie #FileSharing, nur privat und sicher.
Die Empfehlungsecke wurde sprachlich und inhaltlich komplett überarbeitet. Schaut doch mal rein und hinterlasst euer Feedback. Boost gerne, damit sich das Wissen um die Existenz der Empfehlungsecke weiter verbreitet.❤️
#EU#France#HADOPI#Copyright#Filesharing#Privacy#DataProtection#DataRetention: "This post will argue that the HADOPI system is contrary to the Court’s extensive data retention case law on two counts. First, the HADOPI system operates by relying on automated access to traffic data, which under the Court’s current case law (discussed further below) can only be retained for the purpose of combatting serious crime. Even the AG agrees that copyright infringements clearly cannot be classified as a serious crime (para. 38 of the Opinion). Secondly, the massive access to this traffic data takes place without prior authorisation from a national court or an independent administrative authority.
In his two Opinions, AG Szpunar presents a very different analysis of the case. He concludes that the HADOPI is compatible with EU law. In doing so, he proposes a revision – in his words, a “development” (para. 30 of the second Opinion) – of the Court’s case law on data retention in the online sphere, which will have wide-ranging consequences for the privacy and data protection of everyone using the internet."