supernovae, to random

deleted_by_author

  • Loading...
  • katzenberger,
    @katzenberger@social.tchncs.de avatar

    @mike

    Digital is just one component. Stopping here would be naïve. It takes , too (owning your data), and (getting involved with policy making), otherwise public spaces will just wither under growing .

    When the started discussing the , lots of people were "sure" it would never make a difference. Now it's in effect, we have court rulings like & , plus legal action taken by orgs like @noybeu.

    @hughster @supernovae

    tchambers, (edited ) to fediverse

    From @pluralistic and HT to @erlend for this:

    "Is there something better coming?” I think it’s ; and I think it’s Mastodon for a bunch of reasons. One is that the Mastodon standard was developed when the tech platforms were totally disinterested and didn’t have their fingers on the scale...."

    (Full quote below)

    https://jacobin.com/2023/05/cory-doctorow-big-tech-internet-monopoly-capitalism-artificial-intelligence-crypto/

    devnull,
    @devnull@crag.social avatar

    @mjgardner @tchambers @pluralistic well, as per the minimum is to be able to export the data in a common format. We use csv at , and while you can't easily reimport that format back to another piece of software it is still possible at least.

    valere, to random
    @valere@hostux.social avatar

    The last experiment in progress on Youtube

    aral,
    @aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

    @valere “Protecting yourself from being tracked by us is not allowed on YouTube.”

    CC @noybeu

    lauren, (edited ) to random
    @lauren@mastodon.laurenweinstein.org avatar

    ***** When Google Doesn't Care *****

    Why am I pushing a "Users' Bill of Account Rights" now? While this does not apply only to , I frankly am deeply tired of people coming to me desperate, pleading, for help trying to restore access to locked out Google accounts. Google won't respond to them. They ask who they can talk to? Who can they PAY? Personal and business emails, precious photos, files. They trusted Google. They followed the rules. They did nothing illegal. And they've lost access to everything. To Google, they're just in the noise at Google scale.

    It's been this way at Google since the firm's start, but over the years Google has encouraged ordinary, nontechnical people to trust them more and more. And that usually works great, until something goes wrong.

    Up to now, I've sometimes been able to informally help in these situations, via contacts at Google. But even that has become much more difficult. This is getting worse, not better.

    Google has the resources -- money and smart minds -- to solve these problems. This is not rocket science, or even computer science. There are straightforward ways to make this far better for Google users otherwise locked out and left to swing in the wind. The sad fact is that Google simply doesn't consider them to rise to the level worth helping.

    This must change now. -L

    aktivismoEstasMiaLuo,

    @lauren @rrwo The does entitle users to their data & it states that ID required to satisfy access reqs cannot be a higher degree of proof than what was needed to open the acct. The problem is that the GDPR has no teeth. Corps ignore the GDPR, ppl report it to the DPA under art. 77, then the DPA does nothing. There is nothing in the GDPR that forces the DPA to act. It’s a toothless mandate

    nattiegoogie, to random

    So ... I've been in IT for 20+ years, most of that time working directly in databases.

    That whole thing about Twitter, FB, Reddit, Google, whoever ... "deleting" your data after you jump thru the right hoops.

    That's all bullshit.

    I mean, even apart from the whole "market, monetize, sell and spy on our userbase" thing.

    DBAs, people who actually work with databases, we almost never actually delete stuff in a database.

    1/

    aral,
    @aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

    @nattiegoogie Which reminds me, I really need to post the latest bullshit letter I got from Twitter in my ongoing right to erasure dispute with them through the Irish “DPC”.

    Basically boils down to this.

    CC @noybeu

    arstechnica, to random
    @arstechnica@mastodon.social avatar

    Google Bard hits over 180 countries and territories—none are in the EU

    Google is expanding Bard availability as the EU crafts landmark AI regulation.

    https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/05/google-bard-hits-over-180-countries-and-territories-none-are-in-the-eu/?utm_brand=arstechnica&utm_social-type=owned&utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social

    kkarhan,

    @arstechnica well, that won't work as - which applies to - is inherently incompatible with !

    but I'm shure @maxschrems and @noybeu will confirm that...

    johnnyryan, to random
    @johnnyryan@eupolicy.social avatar

    This morning: we publish analysis of enforcement as we near 5 years.

    75% of Ireland's GDPR decisions in EU-level cases have been overruled by the European Data Protection Board.

    See the link for more.

    https://www.iccl.ie/digital-data/iccl-2023-gdpr-report/

    johnnyryan,
    @johnnyryan@eupolicy.social avatar

    Almost 5 years after the , there has been little substantial enforcement in EU-level cases.
    The EDPB register of final decisions reveals that most (64%) of the 159 enforcement measures by late 2022 were merely reprimands.
    (Excludes "amicable resolutions")

    Frederik_Borgesius, to tech

    Apparently the fine will be higher. ‘Meta on Monday was fined a record 1.2 billion euros ($1.3 billion) and ordered to stop transferring data collected from Facebook users in Europe to the United States, in a major ruling against the social media company for violating European Union data protection rules.’ https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/22/business/meta-facebook-eu-privacy-fine.html

    Frederik_Borgesius,
    pluralistic, to random
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    If you've followed my work for a long time, you've watched me transition from a "" who posts 5-15 short hits every day to an "essay-" who posts 5-7 long articles/week. I'm loving the new mode of working, but returning to linkblogging is also intensely, unexpectedly gratifying:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/05/02/wunderkammer/#jubillee

    --

    If you'd like an essay-formatted version to read/share, here's a link to pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:

    https://pluralistic.net/2023/05/13/four-bar-linkage/#linkspittle

    1/

    pluralistic,
    @pluralistic@mamot.fr avatar

    Bennett and I followed up "Privacy Without Monopoly" with an appendix that focused on a territory where there is a privacy law: the EU, whose (patchily enforced) () is the kind of privacy law that we call for in the original paper. In that appendix, we addressed the issues of GDPR enforcement:

    https://www.eff.org/wp/interoperability-and-privacy#gdpr

    32/

    ilumium, to random
    @ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar

    I'm following @beuc's online and I still fail to understand this:

    Their representative polls found that "the further away from the GP, the less people are willing to share their " and yet BEUC concludes that while data use by medical profl's should require consent, for secondary use by and an option is enough. ❓❓❓

    BEUC poll conclusions: 1. Respondents are very selective about the health data they are willing to share 2. |t depends on the entity and level of trust with whom they are ready to share health data 3. Respondents want to choose what happens to their health data and they prefer explicit consent 4. Different attitudes towards cross-border sharing of health data

    ilumium,
    @ilumium@eupolicy.social avatar

    OK @beuc's event on is over.

    tl;dr:

    🤩 @TheProgressives MEP seems to have patients' right to front and centre. Kudos!

    😖 The @EU_Commission seems to neither understand nor their own law . Sad!

    💸 The wants to milk us for more profits. Surprise!

    🤔 And defends ' rights but for some reason less so when it comes to the secondary use of records by 3rd parties.

    *** END ***

    glynmoody, to internet
    @glynmoody@mastodon.social avatar

    Our Response to the Decision on ’s EU-US Data Transfers - https://about.fb.com/news/2023/05/our-response-to-the-decision-on-facebooks-eu-us-data-transfers/ wow, this is spectacularly misleading on just about every level...

    craignicol,

    @glynmoody So Meta's argument is "if you won't let us copy personal data to the US, it will make it harder for anyone to copy personal data to the US"

    So that would be what the P in is for then?

    lowresolution, to ChatGPT

    is available in 180 countries, but not in the EU, because of the , even after the blocking of by the Italian Garante.

    I believe we need to think on how much policies are pushing Europe and its economy further and further away from innovation and new technologies.

    Europe is falling behind, the lag is visible in many areas and is becoming a serious problem.

    https://9to5google.com/2023/05/11/google-bard-european-union/

    jbzfn, to ChatGPT
    @jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar
    jbzfn, to random
    @jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar

    「 Maslouh noticed the excessive age of some of the European personal data within it, and also noted that many of the records for so-called passive applicants—who had not actively applied to Google—showed no evidence of Google ever having reached out to them. Many of these individuals were listed as working for organizations such as Interpol, the CIA, the U.K. Home Office, the European Parliament, and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 」


    https://fortune.com/2023/05/10/exclusive-google-recruitment-ghire-gdpr-violation-whistleblower/

    kytta, to random
    @kytta@fosstodon.org avatar

    #TrustArc is the most obnoxious #GDPR popup solution. Takes up the whole screen, relies on <iframe>s to work, and saving the preferences takes another minute. Whenever I see a website using it, I just disable JavaScript altogether

    MediaActivist, to internet

    Meta facing third fine of 2023 for mishandling EU user data under GDPR
    https://go.theregister.com/feed/www.theregister.com/2023/05/18/meta_facing_third_gdpr_fine/

    ancatdubh, to internet

    Meta Ireland fined €1.2 billion for violating GDPR by transferring EU/EEA users’ data to the US without adequate protection. DPC orders Meta Ireland to suspend future transfers and cease unlawful processing within 6 months. Decision follows EDPB dispute resolution.

    Link:
    https://dataprotection.ie/en/news-media/press-releases/Data-Protection-Commission-announces-conclusion-of-inquiry-into-Meta-Ireland

    Further reporting:
    https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2023/0522/1384948-meta-fined-12-billion/

    Edit: The Meta Press Release:
    https://about.fb.com/news/2023/05/our-response-to-the-decision-on-facebooks-eu-us-data-transfers/

    MediaActivist, to random
    Frederik_Borgesius, to tech

    Almost the entire world can use Google's chatbot Bard except Europe. The reason remains vague, so far.

    With some quotes from me (In Dutch). I speculate that the Google is unsure how to comply with the GDPR, such as the GDPR's transparency requirements.

    'Bijna de hele wereld kan Google’s chatbot Bard gebruiken behalve Europa, de reden blijft (nog) vaag'

    https://www.volkskrant.nl/nieuws-achtergrond/bijna-de-hele-wereld-kan-google-s-chatbot-bard-gebruiken-behalve-europa-de-reden-blijft-nog-vaag~bd12f913/

    fuomag9, to random

    or people, this is not for banners right?

    image/jpeg
    image/jpeg

    maugendre,
    @maugendre@hachyderm.io avatar

    @fuomag9
    Under the , orgs must obtain consent before collecting data. Therefore most Cookie walls are indeed illegal.

    @data @dataGovernance

    jbzfn, to random
    @jbzfn@mastodon.social avatar

    「 Clearview AI, the US startup that’s attracted notoriety in recent years for a massive privacy violation after it scraped selfies off the Internet and used people’s data to build a facial recognition tool it pitched to law enforcement and others, has been hit with another fine in France over non-cooperation with the data protection regulator 」
    @TechCrunch


    https://techcrunch.com/2023/05/10/clearview-ai-another-cnil-gspr-fine

    mojo, to internet

    reports that regulators have fined Facebook $1.3 Billion for violating .

    https://l.smartnews.com/p-CwYMA/cmQF9K

    glynmoody, to random
    @glynmoody@mastodon.social avatar

    MWC’s organizer slapped with fine over ID checks due diligence - https://techcrunch.com/2023/05/08/gsma-mwc-aedp-gdpr-dpia-fine/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • everett
  • osvaldo12
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • tester
  • Youngstown
  • Durango
  • slotface
  • ngwrru68w68
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • ethstaker
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • modclub
  • khanakhh
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines