Wie intelligent is Künstliche-Intelligenz und deren Betreiber?! Ich dachte, die Industrie ist mittlerweile wissender. Anscheinend nicht und doch so wie damals.
»Atomantrieb für energiehungrige KI-Server:
Amazon, Microsoft und Google sichern sich in den USA Atomstrom zur Versorgung ihrer stromdurstigen (KI-)Rechenzentren.«
I'm not going to quote or link to the post, but I just left this comment. I'll add something to it at the end.
========== Begin Citation ==========
You're not going to learn what the search algorithms are doing from the API documentation. You're not going to learn what the ranking signals are from the API documentation. That's a fairy tale cooked up by people who obviously don't understand just how ubiquitous APIs have become in the development world. They are used to move data between clients and files (usually both ways where protocol buffers are concerned).
You got some interesting names and acronyms from the APIs. That's cool and fun to play with. But no one learned anything about how Google collects and processes this data, or where the data was used, when it was used, what they hoped to accomplish from using it, or what the results were.
All this "algorithm" stuff is just nonsense and you will lead a much improved life if you just walk away from these fairy tales before you do something really stupid with a Website people's livelihoods depend on.
=========== End Citation ===========
The people who think the API documents have spilled the guts of Google's algorithm and proven that Googlers have been lying to you for years created a clown show that - for now - simply embarrasses the entire search engine optimization world.
It's when the new tools and tool features start rolling out, and when the new "SEO secrets to success" courses that incorporate the nonsense the SEO community have been telling each other, that the real damage will be done.
Frankly, I don't care if you people nuke your own Websites with this stupidity. If you insist on being THAT gullible you deserve to waste your time, energy, and money on ridiculous fairy tale optimization.
But those of you who are selling your services or doing full-time work as in-house SEOs - these aren't just YOUR livelihoods you're risking on your fantasies and bullshit misinterpretations. You're putting OTHER people's livelihoods at risk.
The SEO community has done this before. You guys just latch on to some get-traffic-quick scheme and roll with it until the crap in the search results becomes so intolerable the search engines are forced to take drastic action. That's happened time and again since Black Monday in 1998.
Obviously most of you are never going to learn to check your dreams and egos at the door. You're going to continue cooking up nonsense theories and backslapping each other over your ridiculous guesses at how large software systems work.
Your magical thinking makes you feel good but I look back at all the times small businesses - and sometimes big enterprises - had to scramble to uncook the disasters created by SEO specialists who followed a "theory" or accepted as verified fact some nonsense that clearly contradicted what the search engineers told us.
Learn from this - not what you wish for - but what you need to learn. Do better.
Samsung is facing a labor strike for the first time ever. Apple is union busting. The FCC cancelled its affordable internet program. AI is all the rage with investors, but no one is using it.
Android trackers are FINALLY here! And, we should chat announcements at Computex!
These days when I see irrelevant ads on websites or #YouTube, I smile instead of getting pissed, for one simple reason: #Google [most probably] have no idea about my preferences. The downside is that it also suggests BS videos on YouTube.
There is also a conspiracy theory take on this too: Google knows me well, but it choose to show me irrelevant ads just to pretend.
I ordered these LITERALLY a YEAR AGO to the day, and they JUST ARRIVED!
Apple stalled the Google location tracker network for as long as they could, but now we FINALLY have some competition for AirTags!
Most Web-savvy folks know that Chrome’s lineage can be traced back to Safari (WebKit, etc.), and be traced further back to KDE’s Konquerer (KHTML, etc.).
This means, among other things, that uBlock Origin is about to be disabled in Chrome. Google will choose a different extension to recommend but it can not be as effective as #uBlock Origin.
Following #Google's example, may I instead recommend you switch to #Firefox.
Firefox will continue to support Manifest v2, and consequently uBlock Origin and other extensions that can not be implemented with Manifest v3.
Oho, za chwilę przywrócą tę funkcję do Firefoksa, bo oni kopiują Chrome w głupi sposób, więc i skopiują rzecz, którą wcześniej już mieli i usunęli, bo chcieli skopiować sztywność menu z Chrome... xD #firefox#chrome#mozilla#google#browser
In a new podcast, Linus(Tech) said that with the upcoming #Windows#AI bruhaha, a lot of users are going to move to #Chromebooks. But just today #Google announced that AI is coming on their #Chromebook line too. Maybe just a chatbot for now, but eventually, it'll be more integrated. The only option (for those who can't stand #Apple), is #Linux, on their existing, older PC. That's why distros running in low RAM are important.
Importantly, it touches not just on the value of the presence of #information from from election campaigns, it reflects on the (negative) value of the absence of information.
"[T]he US government is...trying to break up #Google, the largest #tech#company in the history of the world, and there has been virtually no press about it.
" #Biden's comms team isn't bragging about the administration's accomplishments, because the senior partners in this coalition oppose those accomplishments. They don't want to win an #election based on the promise to prosecute an anti-corporate revolution, because they are counter-revolutionaries."
From eating rocks to putting glue on pizza, Google’s AI Overviews has given us a good laugh and plenty of memes over the past week, thanks to the many hilariously inaccurate answers it has given to several search queries.
However, these clearly wrong answers are not the problem we should be focusing on, argues @FastCompany. “It’s the errors that don’t call attention to their ridiculous selves that could do the most damage to Google Search and everyone who relies on it.” Here’s more.