TechDesk, to TikTok
@TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

Frank McCourt, the billionaire real estate mogul and former owner of the Los Angeles Dodgers, is currently working on a bid to buy TikTok, according to reports.

While it remains to be seen whether TikTok’s parent company ByteDance will agree to a sale to anyone, @Gizmodo reports that “McCourt’s background in utopian tech advocacy makes him an interesting figure to enter the race.” Here’s what we know so far.

https://flip.it/2yVwdF

ramin_hal9001, to fediverse
@ramin_hal9001@emacs.ch avatar

PC world has an article here about whether you can use a VPN to circumvent the #TikTokBan .

No. Just, no. Not #VPN, nor any other technology is a solution, because the problem is much deeper than that. The US banning TikTok is just the beginning, they will simply continue expanding #censorship of any content the government finds objectionable. We may soon find governments like the US passing legislation that running an #ActivityPub server of any kind is illegal "terrorist activity" before long, and all NATO countries will follow suit (they must, or else risk losing NATO membership).

And of course the stated reason for the US blocking whole portions of the Internet is for "cypersecurity" reasons. Anyone with half a brain knows the real reason is to try to prevent sharing knowledge across borders, because that is the real threat to the politicians and their bosses.

It is really no different than what countries like China does with their Great Firewall, or what Iran does whitelisting only certain blocks of the Internet that exists outside of their borders, also for "cybersecurity" reasons. Of course the US government will continue to cite censorship of free speech as a reason that countries like China or Iran are inherently evil. This deranged political double-speak is the norm nowadays, as "antisemitism" is used as a justification to arrest Jewish people who protest war at their universities, but I digress.

TonyStark, to random
@TonyStark@progressivecafe.social avatar

A must-read article from Anne Applebaum. It has been obvious for a while that pro-Trump social media is mostly foreign propaganda. The irony of using “America First” to sabotage America is no doubt something foreign trolls find amusing.

Fear, cynicism, nihilism, and apathy, coupled with disgust and disdain for democracy: that is what modern autocrats sell and there are far too many people falling for it.

Russia and China Are Winning the Propaganda War - The Atlantic:
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2024/06/china-russia-republican-party-relations/678271/

david1,
@david1@mastodon.world avatar

@TonyStark I thought Applebaum would argue that Chinese owned was spreading propaganda to sabotage America, but she doesn't mention it at all. This is surprising since that's the primary argument in support of the

jeremy_pm,
@jeremy_pm@mastodon.nz avatar

@david1 @TonyStark

The calls for a #TikTokBan come from Zionists who have lost the ability to control the narrative and has absolutely nothing to do with China. The majority of Tik Tok is owned by ByteDance a company based in Los Angeles and Singapore.

TechDesk, (edited ) to TikTok
@TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

TikTok is suing the United States government in an attempt to stop the enforcement of last month’s bill, which would ban the app in the U.S unless its Chinese owner ByteDance sells up.

The lawsuit argues that the bill is an “unprecedented violation” of the First Amendment, and says that invoking national security concerns is not a sufficient reason for restricting free speech. NBC News has more, but we’re keen to hear what you think. Do you agree with the bill?

https://flip.it/svyfvV

eff, to TikTok
@eff@mastodon.social avatar

The impact of this legislation isn’t entirely clear yet, but what is clear: whether #TikTok is banned or sold to new owners, millions of people in the U.S. will no longer be able to get information and communicate with each other as they presently do. https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/05/biden-signed-tiktok-ban-whats-next-tiktok-users

chiefgyk3d,
@chiefgyk3d@social.chiefgyk3d.com avatar

@eff yeah this is pissing me off as I’m one of the larger cybersecurity creators on TikTok at 368,000 followers. It’s still how everyone finds my mastodon, twitch, and soon YouTube. It’s still also 80% of my revenue for my content creation LLC between shop and content payouts.

I’ve been on the platform since the pandemic started and any concerns we have about TikTok were already said about Meta and others

TechDesk, to TikTok
@TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

European Commission President, Ursula von der Leyen has hinted that banning TikTok in the EU is not off the table.

Speaking at a debate ahead of the bloc’s 2024 election, von der Leyen said that the Commission was “the very first institution worldwide to ban TikTok on our corporate phones,” reports Politico, adding: “We know exactly the danger of TikTok.”

https://flip.it/W-m.AR

TechDesk, to TikTok
@TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

After failing to stop a bill that could ban it in the U.S., TikTok now faces two big hurdles — the U.S. judicial system and the Chinese government, reports @theverge

While ByteDance has promised to fight the ruling, which requires it to divest the app within a year, it won’t be an easy fight, with experts unsure how keen judges will be to weigh in on decisions of national security importance. If it fails, it will have to consider selling TikTok. But that’s not a decision it will be able to make alone — it’ll need the Chinese government’s permission.

https://flip.it/11C9f1

#TikTok #ByteDance #SocialMedia #TikTokBan #Tech

Norobiik, to FreeSpeech
@Norobiik@noc.social avatar

TikTok CEO has said the company will take the fight against the new law to the courts, but some experts believe that for the , national security considerations could outweigh protection.

While is a global phenomenon, it represents a small fraction of 's revenue, according to analysts and investors.

ByteDance says 'no plans' to sell TikTok after US ban law
https://www.france24.com/en/live-news/20240426-bytedance-says-no-plans-to-sell-tiktok-after-us-ban-law

pmarrone, to TikTok
@pmarrone@mastodon.social avatar

It seems like uses to distribute its videos. What type of heavy lift might it be to create a alternative in the wake of the ? Asking for my friends. Please RT.

benroyce,
@benroyce@mastodon.social avatar

@pmarrone

a alternative is being built:

@loops

for those going "Tiktok is for class solidarity..." (someone wrote this crap to me!)

motherf***er tiktok is co-owned by Jeff Yass, the biggest donor

"crushing Tiktok is about stopping pro- protest organizing..."

you f***ing dingbat, Jeff Yass used Tiktok money to fund an rightwing thinktank to try to corrupt the judiciary to keep in power

GET THE F*** OFF TIKTOK YOU AIRHEADS

beardedtechguy, to fediverse
@beardedtechguy@allthingstech.social avatar
EighthLayer, to TikTok
@EighthLayer@mstdn.games avatar

Imagine the US banning before guns. 🤦‍♂️

dansup, to random
@dansup@mastodon.social avatar

TikTok, Girl bye!!

Hello @loops, who's ready for the beta?

mreader, to TikTok
@mreader@mas.to avatar
  • If you blame Joe Biden for the TikTok law, you don't understand how U.S. government works.

  • Trump also tried to ban it. He failed. It's not a partisan issue.

  • Court challenges could keep TikTok alive in the U.S. a few years, and possibly save it.

--

Why is US threatening to ban TikTok? Will other countries follow suit?

Here is a guide to TikTok legislation and what may happen next.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/apr/24/why-is-us-threatening-to-ban-tiktok-and-could-other-countries-follow-suit?CMP=share_btn_url #TikTokBan #TikTok #1stAmendment #China #espionage #data #ByteDance #CCP

TechDesk, to TikTok
@TechDesk@flipboard.social avatar

President Joe Biden has signed a foreign aid bill that will ban TikTok in the U.S. unless its parent company, Chinese-owned ByteDance, divests within a year.

The company has an initial nine months to sort out a deal, though the president could extend that by another three months if he sees progress, reports @theverge. However, TikTok has said it will be fighting the bill in the courts, claiming “facts and the Constitution” are on its side.

https://flip.it/UMXHYm

murawski, to TikTok Polish
@murawski@mastodon.com.pl avatar

Kongres USA uchwalił ustawę, która może doprowadzić do zakazu TikToka w Stanach Zjednoczonych, jeśli jego chińska firma-matka ByteDance nie sprzeda aplikacji w ciągu najbliższego roku. Ustawa została uchwalona przez Izbę Reprezentantów i teraz trafi do Senatu, a następnie do podpisu prezydenta.
Ustawa daje ByteDance do 9 miesięcy, z możliwością 3-miesięcznego przedłużenia, na sprzedaż TikToka amerykańskiemu nabywcy zatwierdzonemu przez władze USA. Jeśli nie, apka wylatuje ze sklepów.

#tiktok #tiktokban #socialmedia

airwhale, to TikTok
@airwhale@mastodon.social avatar

"If the Chinese Government want user data on US citizens' social media usage, they'll just have to buy it from our data brokers like everyone else."

  • Multiple US senators, apparently

benroyce,
@benroyce@mastodon.social avatar

@airwhale

"#china can buy our info, so why go after #tiktok"

is like

"i can get mugged on the street, so i'd rather invite the mugger into my house and get into my bed with them"

the strange tale of people on mastodon of all places, posturing and contorting for tiktok, is bizarre

if in the name of privacy you wind up defending the likes of tiktok, you took a wrong turn somewhere

you want to defend privacy:

you want to argue from principles:

you attack tiktok and #facebook

#tiktokban

noellemitchell, to TikTok
@noellemitchell@mstdn.social avatar

Wonder what will end up happening with this #TikTok ban thingy 🤔

#TikTokBan #SocialMedia #tech

Rosencrantz, to internet
@Rosencrantz@mastodon.social avatar

: This week in the Loony Loop-factory: TikTok gets a US ban just because it's Chinese, and the 's defenders seem to think they're protecting .

Shooting TikToks in a Barrel:
https://wastedwordsweb.wordpress.com/2024/04/23/shooting-tiktoks-in-a-barrel/

benroyce,
@benroyce@mastodon.social avatar

@Rosencrantz

i really don't get it

i just finished talking to a guy who said was a tool of "class solidarity"

you know...

the social media company that is coowned by and funds Jeff Yass, the biggest donor in the USA

who also funded an Israeli thinktank that tried to destroy the judiciary to help

that tiktok. that "tool of class solidarity"

wtf is wrong with people?

david1, to TikTok
@david1@mastodon.world avatar

One of the striking things about the ban is it makes certain type of source code, even , effectively illegal. Aside from intellectual property law, source code has never been made illegal. The bill specifically says it is illegal to "distribute, maintain, or update" TikTok source code and it is also illegal for an "internet hosting service" to enable such actions.

https://www.congress.gov/bill/118th-congress/house-bill/7521/text

MagentaRocks, to random
@MagentaRocks@mastodon.coffee avatar

#TikTokBan

"National security officials in Washington have feared that the Chinese government could use TikTok to promote propaganda aimed at interfering in U.S. elections, or surveil some of the 170 million Americans who use the app every month."

-They don't need Tiktok to promote propaganda. The GOP, Facebook, Twitter, Fox News, etc. also does it for them.

-No need to 'surveil' users when the put everything out in public anyway. Besides the US Govt does already.

https://www.npr.org/2024/04/20/1245594589/house-approves-bill-tiktok-ban

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • tester
  • kavyap
  • cisconetworking
  • vwfavf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • mdbf
  • magazineikmin
  • Youngstown
  • ngwrru68w68
  • slotface
  • thenastyranch
  • ethstaker
  • khanakhh
  • rosin
  • megavids
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • Durango
  • cubers
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • anitta
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines