Tupp_ed, to random

I was on Morning Ireland today, talking about some of the wider implications of the Meta €1.2bn fine and orders for data transfers, TikTok and EU data relations with Chinese and US companies, and the data supply chain for EU companies.

All in less than 7 minutes!

https://www.rte.ie/radio/radio1/clips/22253888/

HistoPol,
@HistoPol@mastodon.social avatar
Mjo321, to random

European Union hits Facebook parent Meta with record $1.3 billion privacy fine. https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/european-union-hits-facebook-parent-meta-with-record-1-3-billion-privacy-fine

HistoPol, (edited )
@HistoPol@mastodon.social avatar

@Mjo321

s/: Wouldn't that be wonderful? /s

"Meta, which had previously warned that 👉services for its users in could be cut off👈, vowed to appeal and ask courts to immediately put the decision on hold.

/s: I am quite sure that 's advertising clients will appreciate that 411 million users* will not benefit from their adverts, and they will most certainly not see any breach of contract either. /s

Source:
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/european-union-hits-facebook-parent-meta-with-record-1-3-billion-privacy-fine

https://www.statista.com/statistics/745400/facebook-europe-mau-by-quarter/

Jigsaw_You, to internet Dutch
@Jigsaw_You@mastodon.nl avatar

tech giant has been hit with a record €1.2 billion fine for not complying with the ’s privacy rulebook.”

What are the geopolitical implications? 🤔

@geopolitics

https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-hits-meta-with-record-e1-2b-privacy-fine/

pmroman, (edited )

@Jigsaw_You @geopolitics In the end, good will doesn't suffice: must fulfill to operate in The EU, that simple. Of Course Meta could lobby the US Congress to pass legislation consistent with that implemented in the EU, this issue is Meta's problem, not ours to resolve nor accommodate. Surprising the lack of functionality of, my otherwise beloved, on this issue: trusting international agreements to discretionary authority is a no-no.

rolle, (edited ) to internet
@rolle@mementomori.social avatar

If Facebook and Instagram were to join the Fediverse and you could follow users from that world from your instance, would you do it?

Boosts appreciated. I'd like to know the current consensus of the Fediverse.

jdp23,

@supernovae
My point was just that it’s misleading to say will only be tracking people who use their app. Just like with Gab, with the protocol and vanilla Mastodon’s implementation, being on a site that federates with them is likely to give them access to your data.
@rolle

Kencf618033,
@Kencf618033@disabled.social avatar

@rolle
@StacieBee

Never been one to put all my eggs in one basket.

rolle,
@rolle@mementomori.social avatar

The opinion is divided. There is no consensus.

j, to fediverse

This will probably piss some people off, BUT..

I really don't want Meta in the Fediverse. It'll just be more of the same old crap. If (or when) it happens, I'm done here.

Brownian_motion,
@Brownian_motion@mastodon.scot avatar

https://janerationx.me/@j Why would anyone whose centered want to see here? Just sounds like a bad idea.

tim, to fediverse
@tim@mastodon.timnolte.com avatar

So while one key piece of the is that entire instances can be blocked as a form of moderation, and keeping things safe for people. I think it should be clearly stated to newcomers to any instance if entire platforms such as / / / .com / (through a bridge) are being blocked.

If someone wants to have a federated identity and follow family/friends on Meta then they are SOL if an instance completely blocks the entire platform.

mastodonmigration, (edited )
@mastodonmigration@mastodon.online avatar

@tim When you sign up for , or you agree to give them a license to content you post. It is a very broad perpetual license giving them lots of rights to your content, including the right to sublicense. When you sign up for Mastodon, most instances do not take a license, the content rights you give them are defined in the privacy policy, and they do not include reposting your content to corporate sites that assume licenses to the content.


1/

tim,
@tim@mastodon.timnolte.com avatar

@anthracite I'm also not arguing for anything other than transparency for the general public. You may not want anything to do with Facebook but that doesn't mean others don't. Additionally, wouldn't you want your instance admins to be clear that they are blocking Facebook so you can have the peace of mind in knowing you don't have to deal with content coming from their services?

2/2

tim,
@tim@mastodon.timnolte.com avatar

@anthracite so to be clear there is nothing technical standing in the way of any business from joining the . If you aren't aware of how the Fediverse and it's protocols work it is a completely open standard. Saying you don't want on the Fediverse is like saying you don't want them on the internet. It just doesn't work that way.

1/2

jo, to fediverse

Gosh, the is annoying enough with the influx of liberal tech bros, reply guys; and centrist bootlickers, let alone Karen and Creepy Uncle being able to find us here. FML

RE: https://calckey.social/notes/9eyg1uzy28

oatmeal, to internet
@oatmeal@emacs.ch avatar

L’internet, c’est moi… 🙄 «Without the ability to transfer data across borders, the internet risks being carved up into national and regional silos, restricting the global economy and leaving citizens in different countries unable to access many of the shared services we have come to rely on» https://about.fb.com/news/2023/05/our-response-to-the-decision-on-facebooks-eu-us-data-transfers

SomeGadgetGuy, to tech
@SomeGadgetGuy@techhub.social avatar

Give us a share and come join the chat! The show is GO! https://www.twitch.tv/somegadgetguy
300: Meta Fined $1 Billion, DoorDash Charges iPhone Users More, Adults Don't Use Twitter, Right to Repair in France

ancatdubh, to internet

Meta Ireland fined €1.2 billion for violating GDPR by transferring EU/EEA users’ data to the US without adequate protection. DPC orders Meta Ireland to suspend future transfers and cease unlawful processing within 6 months. Decision follows EDPB dispute resolution.

Link:
https://dataprotection.ie/en/news-media/press-releases/Data-Protection-Commission-announces-conclusion-of-inquiry-into-Meta-Ireland

Further reporting:
https://www.rte.ie/news/business/2023/0522/1384948-meta-fined-12-billion/

Edit: The Meta Press Release:
https://about.fb.com/news/2023/05/our-response-to-the-decision-on-facebooks-eu-us-data-transfers/

glynmoody, to internet
@glynmoody@mastodon.social avatar

Hit With 1.2 Billion Euros Fine For Violating the – Time It Adopted a Federated Approach - https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/blog/meta-gdpr-fine/

fooflington, to internet

Hearing "complaining that the company has been “singled out when using the same legal mechanism as thousands of other companies looking to provide services in Europe”" sounds awfully like my children saying "but X was doing it too…".

… to which the answer is "Yes, and I'll deal with them shortly".

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/may/23/techscape-splinternet-meta-facebook-fine

smallpatatas, to internet

Lol

but guys they made React

mojo, to internet

reports that regulators have fined Facebook $1.3 Billion for violating .

https://l.smartnews.com/p-CwYMA/cmQF9K

stilkov, to internet

was hit on Monday with a record 1.2 billion euro ($1.3 billion) fine by its lead privacy regulator in the European Union for its handling of user information and given five months to stop transferring users’ data to the United States” https://www.reuters.com/technology/meta-hit-by-record-12-bln-euro-fine-by-eu-over-us-data-transfers-2023-05-22/

osc, to internet

The upcoming clone from and will apparently be compatible with , probably via

https://www.theverge.com/2023/5/19/23730070/instagram-twitter-app-competitor-leak

matthieu_xyz, to fediverse

Step 1: Post nudes on
Step 2: Get your mastodon instance blocked by because of nudity
Step 3: Spread the message on meta/barcelona that they’re blocking nudes and you should really migrate to mastodon to see all the nudes
Step 4: ???
Step 5: Profit

Imoptimal, to internet
@Imoptimal@mastodon.social avatar

This fine issued by the to , for it's abuse of it's users data privacy () is a good start, but companies should be fined on a monthly basis, if you ask me ..

https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-hits-meta-with-record-e1-2b-privacy-fine/

Siltaer, to internet French
@Siltaer@mamot.fr avatar

s’est vu infli­ger une amende record de 1,2 milliard d’eu­ros du régu­la­teur irlan­dais pour avoir enfreint les règles euro­péennes sur la protec­tion des données () avec son réseau social Face­book
https://twitter.com/afpfr/status/1660579656548900864

stairjoke, to internet

was fined USD 1.3B and seems to think it doesn’t have to change how it does business. The EU and US are trying to figure out how and the can coexist peacefully—I think in vain. And EU companies use US services that are probably not compliant with GDPR to compete in the digital market.

https://beachball.tech/blog/2023/May/Meta-GDPR-fine

Imoptimal, to internet
@Imoptimal@mastodon.social avatar

Good to see the anti-competition laws forcing to sell applications that strengthen their monopolistic position.

I just wish this would occur more often, especially with companies on the rise ( and ), not just that's already struggling.

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-65684986

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • rosin
  • thenastyranch
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • InstantRegret
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • magazineikmin
  • everett
  • Youngstown
  • mdbf
  • slotface
  • kavyap
  • anitta
  • GTA5RPClips
  • khanakhh
  • normalnudes
  • osvaldo12
  • provamag3
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • modclub
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • tester
  • lostlight
  • All magazines