CJEU-C-251/21 Meta Platforms and Others v Bundeskartellamt
Just a snippet
"Furthermore, the CJEU held that where the user of an online social network visits websites or apps to which one or more of the categories set out in Article 9(1) GDPR relate, the user does not 'manifestly make public', within the meaning of Article 9(2)(e) GDPR, the data relating to those visits collected by the operator of that online social network via cookies or similar storage technologies."
"According to the CJEU, in the absence of the data subject’s consent, the personalised advertising by which Facebook finances its activity, cannot justify the processing of the data at issue as a 'legitimate interest' pursued by Meta pursuant to Article 6(1)(f) GDPR. "
Love that Dr Pimple Popper can literally show oozing pustules in her #YouTube thumbnails, but I can't show my heinous female nipples, even if I pixelate them into incomprehensible blurs. 🙃
Just the name Dr #PimplePopper makes me want to 🤮, let alone have thumbnails SHOWING burst #pimples show up in my feed, yet repeatedly I've had #YouTube ban thumbnails of pre- #censored nonsexual female nipples, even when I've already blurred them out (to say nothing of the entire pre- censored videos they've banned over and over again). Yet of course, YouTube, along with #tiktok#Instagram#facebook etc-forever are chock full of entirely UNcensored MALE nipples with MILLIONS of views, that somehow DON'T get #banned as sexually explicit nudity" 🙃
I know I'm a broken record about this, but how does this make sense?? How tf do the majority of people, even alleged #progressive#leftists just unthinkingly go along with the #patriarchal#sexist#misogynistic view that "of course, female nipples are sexually explicit nudity, but male nipples aren't. OBVIOUSLY."? or at most, they go "yeah it's not fair, but what can we do?"
Maybe... Mention it in your own content? Spare comments in the replies of my own posts about this are certainly appreciated, and better than no words of support at all. But we will NEVER make progress towards #genderEquality as long as more people aren't pointing out blatant sexism (and #transphobia - at what point does a nipple look "female" or "male" enough to get banned/not banned?) in public places, loud and unapologetic. I know compared to many world issues, wanting the same rights as "male-looking chests" online and in public seems silly and self-serving. But it's all part of the subjugation of female-presenting people. It's still #techBro#thePatriarchy - designed #algorithms declaring "only we have the authority to decide women's bodies are sexually explicit unless they adhere to what we, the men, decide are permissible modes of living." It's #rapeCulture, its the objectification of women's bodies without our #consent, it's taking away our #bodilyAutonomy while granting male bodies (again, adhering to whatever arbitrary scale determines what a "male" or "female" body is) freedom. It's BS.
It's a bit sad that Fedora has a discussion on whether they'll ask users for #consent before sending out telemetry:
It could be worse: and they're at least considering it. But it's shocking how the tech industry and business world struggle with this whole concept.
I guess it doesn't just apply to things like telemetry or privacy either, given how there's continuous news of folk physically imposing themselves onto others against their consent.
@simonbs@gruber and they didn’t have to. Cookie banners are intentionally designed to get people to click “accept”. The ethically correct thing is to not collect identifying data at all until it is required for your user, then ask. Instead we get this. I spend part of my professional life helping companies suck less in this area. It’s an uphill struggle. Most don’t want to understand. Easier to throw a cookie banner at it and pretend you’ve acted ethically. #privacy#consent
Die digitale Rentenübersicht ist online. Auszug Datenschutzerklärung: "Beim Abruf einer Seite unseres Internetangebots werden – sofern dem Statistik-Cookie zugestimmt wurde – mit Matomo die folgenden Informationen anonymisiert erfasst [...]" Erfasst wird schon beim Besuch der Seite und auch dann noch, wenn man den Statistik-Cookie ablehnt. Da muss nachgebessert werden @bfdi.
A group of Americans asked intact men to identify the location on their penis that is most pleasurable to be touched. That location? The foreskin.
They asked circumcised men the same question. That location? The remaining #foreskin.
Infant #circumcision removes the most sensitive and sexually pleasurable tissue from a child without their autonomous #consent, yet provides no meaningful prophylactic effect.
Scarleteen is a sex education website that I used for a few years before I turned 18, but it's full of wisdom that can is equally valuable for adults as well. This is a quick read but an important one for anybody looking to get into kink
My #wwdc take: until people are comfortable being recorded whenever and wherever by whoever, #wearablecomputing is going to have a hard time. We were all told people don't care about privacy (turns out they do) and I suspect we'll now be told people don't care about being recorded whenever and wherever. " #surveillance cameras are already everywhere." "Kids that grew up with YouTube are just more comfortable being constantly on camera." I suspect people will continue to care about #consent.
One of the objectives for advocacy about #CrisisLines is to stop the unregulated and hidden access to crisis conversations by the service providers for any "use" they choose.
Mainly #NonProfits or so-called #DataForGood for-profit corporations aka USA #HealthCareIndustry. Given cover and funding from US gov't contracts. It's not hard to see the #DataRush aided by waiving or trampling #Consent, so these corporations can calibrate algorithms. Which will then be foisted back as "#AI " assistants on those who can't afford care as the "best answer" for them, given care is not available.
This is the so-called #DataEthics of we know best, therefore your consent is not required. And "this is for your own good". Meanwhile, where is the $ flowing?
Invoking the child's right to freedom of religion to justify genital cutting is illogical. In reality it is an argument for the parents to enforce the parent's religion on an unconsenting, uninformed child, violating the child's freedom of religion and right to bodily integrity.
@supernovae Wow, I had no idea you were doing this. Maybe the reason you've had so little pushback is that few other people know you're doing it, either - especially given that a login is required on your instance to see it.
How do I opt out? My account is already opted out of search in my settings, yet I see my posts searchable on your instance.
50 Shades of BS - How to tell the Difference Between Kink and Abuse (www.scarleteen.com)
Scarleteen is a sex education website that I used for a few years before I turned 18, but it's full of wisdom that can is equally valuable for adults as well. This is a quick read but an important one for anybody looking to get into kink