kentbrew, to chrome
@kentbrew@xoxo.zone avatar

Infosec friends are unanimous: if you're using Chrome, you want to visit chrome://settings/adPrivacy and turn off Ad Topics, Site-Suggested Ads, and Ad Measurement.

IMPORTANT: you must do this for each of your Chrome profiles, since it's not a global setting.

davidrevoy, to firefox
@davidrevoy@framapiaf.org avatar
nixCraft, to firefox
@nixCraft@mastodon.social avatar

I have been using since 2004 and do not intend to stop anytime soon. You need to take it out of my dead hands. What about you?

lukasmiz, to pokemon

Google Chrome to soon get a new ‘IP protection’ feature: Here’s what it does (indianexpress.com)

Google will soon start testing a new ‘IP protection’ feature for Chrome users, offering them greater control over their privacy. The tech giant the upcoming feature prevents websites from tracking users by hiding their IP address using proxy servers owned by Google....

WPalant, to chrome

We are currently witnessing the fallout from monopolization in the browser space. Back in 2007, Internet Explorer received much criticism for its phishing protection mechanism which transmitted all visited websites to Microsoft servers. Mozilla paired up with Google and designed a different system which performed most checks locally and preserved users’ privacy. That’s what healthy competition looks like.

Fast forward to 2023. Almost all web browsers in use are either Chrome or based on the Chromium browser engine. With the competition pretty much eliminated, Google is now pushing its “Enhanced Safe Browsing” down everyone’s throats – which is a nice sounding name for “every website you visit is sent to our servers.” The Internet Explorer approach from 2007 all over again, only that now it’s Google getting all this data. And they certainly won’t do anything evil with it. Yeah, sure.

Reminder: Firefox and Safari are the only remaining browsers worth noting which are not using Google’s browser engine.

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/google/google-is-enabling-chrome-real-time-phishing-protection-for-everyone/

Vivaldi, to chrome
@Vivaldi@vivaldi.net avatar

What happens if decides only users can access it? Well, that's what 's new API would do if its new DRM for the moves ahead.

@markhachman covers it on @pcworld ⬇️
https://www.pcworld.com/article/2009730/vivaldi-mozilla-warn-of-googles-proposed-drm-for-the-web.html

rolle, (edited ) to firefox
@rolle@mementomori.social avatar

What is your browser of choice?

thunderbird, to firefox
@thunderbird@mastodon.online avatar

Hey, it doesn't matter how long it takes you to reach the right destination. Only that you eventually arrive 😉

ricci, to firefox
@ricci@discuss.systems avatar

Since I've seen a lot of chatter about people switching to as Google ramps up the enshitification of , let me tell you about a killer feature for people who (a) need multiple accounts on the same websites (eg. devs) or specifically (b) have to use multiple Google accounts.

Firefox has an official addon called Multi Account Containers that lets you trivially set up color coded tabs that have separate sets of cookies. Log into your dev account in one, and your test account in another. Log into your personal in one and have another tab next to it with your work Gmail. I'm actually not signed in to any Google accounts in most my tabs, I just have containers for the specific tasks I do on Google products.

It'll take you 30 seconds to set up.

Add-on: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/multi-account-containers/

Mozilla's explanation: https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/containers

m0bi13, to chrome Polish
@m0bi13@pol.social avatar
semioticstandard, to privacy
@semioticstandard@wandering.shop avatar

You need to stop using Chrome NOW. It’s not hyperbole: Google just rolled out a change to Chrome that tracks the sites you visit, builds a profile, and shares that with any page you visit that asks.

This is real. It’s not tech bro conspiracy shit.

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2023/09/googles-widely-opposed-ad-platform-the-privacy-sandbox-launches-in-chrome

aral, to firefox
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

If you’re switching to , remember Firefox is not private by default. Consider the fork, which is. Otherwise, go into your settings and adjust its tracking features (like having as the default search engine), turn off telemetry, “experiments”, etc.

(Also, if you all switch and Google goes bankrupt, will go bankrupt too because they exist thanks to half a billion dollars a year from Google. So remember Google must survive for Mozilla to survive.)

amxmln, to linux
@amxmln@mastodon.design avatar

Okay so how is it that still doesn’t have two-finger-swipes to navigate history on when literally all other platforms, including ChromeOS, have it? 😒 Sadly, setting the Flag to enabled does nothing.

schizanon, (edited ) to webdev
@schizanon@mas.to avatar

Dear

Who are your favorite and who have stopped posting to Twitter? People who support and in the community on the instead of chasing engagement on a hate-site?

I want to them!!!

aral, to SmallWeb
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

Great, it looks like whatever they changed in Chrome no longer trusts Kitten’s¹ local certificate authority (installed and trusted by the system trust store, as you’d do in a spit enterprise).

Applies to previously trusted and working certificates too.

(The directly related module is Auto Encrypt Localhost²)

Going to look into it today and see if I can’t find a workaround.

FFS…

¹ https://codeberg.org/kitten/app
² https://codeberg.org/small-tech/auto-encrypt-localhost

stu, to chrome
@stu@allthingstech.social avatar

Well of course works flawlessly on my android device but @Vivaldi is still having issues

freemo, to firefox
@freemo@qoto.org avatar

I just rage quit / ... I gave it a good try, solid week... its unusable for me... back to

sesivanyblog, to chrome Czech
@sesivanyblog@blog.eischmann.cz avatar

Nazrál čas dát Firefoxu druhou šanci

Sepsal jsem důvody, proč si myslím, že by měl Firefox dostal zase šanci. Ať už od těch, kteří ho v minulosti opustili, nebo od těch, kteří ho nikdy ani nezkusili.

https://blog.eischmann.cz/2024/02/07/nazral-cas-dat-firefoxu-druhou-sanci/

nrk9819, to web
@nrk9819@mastodon.social avatar

Everytime I want to love @firefox , I realize that it doesn't support View Transitions API 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

kzimmermann, to chrome
@kzimmermann@fosstodon.org avatar

So, that is bad is a no-brainer, but it looks like MS Teams will not work completely (video calls + audio) in . And I don't mean it in the "change UA settings" way, I guess Microsoft just uses something specific to Chrome's engine on it, I think.

So if you depend on this shitty app for work but don't wanna use Chrome (or the desktop client), what do you do? Honest .

trixter, to firefox
@trixter@retro.pizza avatar

Hey infosec nerds: A couple years ago I went all-in on the Apple ecosystem, and I’ve been content with Safari as my default browser since then. Everybody is pushing Firefox as the best alternative to Chrome’s growing enshittification, but is Safari an adequate choice if you’re already elbow-deep in Mac?

brunty, to php
@brunty@brunty.social avatar

folks, what framework-agnostic tooling (as in not / / etc) are you using for running headless browser-based tests these days via something like ?

I'm looking at setting something up in on , I've tried Symfony Panther and it's been a shitshow of errors and not being able to get or running in Docker :/

kubikpixel, to internet German
@kubikpixel@chaos.social avatar

Welcher Internet Browser ist "sicherer"?
Gute Frage und nicht simpel zu beantworten, doch nach meiner Auffassung ist es Firefox und weniger der sehr beliebte Chrome Browser.

So viel ich weiss, gibt es den Firefox länger und hat doch (knapp) weniger bekannte, so wie meistens behobene Schwachpunkte. Weshalb glauben so viele lehre Versprechungen von Konzerne?

🦊 Firefox
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=firefox
🌐 Chrome
https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvekey.cgi?keyword=chrome


devinprater, to accessibility

So, I was thinking about this video on Chrome/Edge accessibility. Basically, it shows that the memory and CPU hog isn't the screen reader, it's the browser/accessibility pipeline. And honestly, it shows how, once again, being disabled is expensive. Not only are we told from a young age that we'll need to work twice as hard as abled people in order to get to the same level as the abled person, and then get a job that pays about $9 an hour for factory type work, or $20 per hour for highly specialized tech knowledge work, we have to buy expensive technology that can allow us to give that 200% of ourselves to our job and lives. Like, you see us buying an iPhone 15 or 14? That's not, for almost all circumstances, as a status symbol. That's because accessibility is so unoptomized that it slows our devices down. Because we have to have modern devices, a good 8 GB RAM (minimum) on a laptop, or a modern A-series chip, or, hell, probably an M-series Mac, just to keep up. I'm not sure about the M-series Mac part as I've not spent enough time with one to see how it compares to my 2019 Intel Mac.

We see this a lot with Android phones. A sighted person may be able to get by with a $250 Samsung phone. But when I worked with one, I felt the lag with TalkBack acutely. We may be able to blame the phones, or the PC's, or Intel Macs. But then why does an Intel PC run just fine with NVDA? No, digital accessibility is all about software. If it can run well for a sighted person, it should run well for a blind person. And that's why I always say that the OS is at the root of all digital accessibility, followed of course by whatever you run above that stack, like the browser. So we have to work 200% more, buy a good 200% more expensive, and we're still slowed down. Do not praise us for overcoming these things. Help us by eliminating the need to overcome them in the first place!!

Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyN7HvwZj18

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • ngwrru68w68
  • rosin
  • modclub
  • DreamBathrooms
  • InstantRegret
  • magazineikmin
  • khanakhh
  • osvaldo12
  • tacticalgear
  • Youngstown
  • everett
  • slotface
  • kavyap
  • anitta
  • thenastyranch
  • mdbf
  • tester
  • GTA5RPClips
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • Durango
  • ethstaker
  • cisconetworking
  • normalnudes
  • megavids
  • cubers
  • lostlight
  • All magazines