“The concern is that machine-generated content has to be balanced with a lot of human review and would overwhelm lesser-known wikis with bad content. While #AI generators are useful for writing believable, human-like text, they are also prone to including erroneous information, and even citing sources and academic papers which don’t exist.”
The only #bullying allowed on #Mastodon is of #crypto and #ai. It's completely acceptable to jump in somebody's replies and be an asshole if they are talking about a technology that you heard is bad.
OpenAI’s regulatory troubles are only just beginning.
The Verge reports: The European Union’s fight with ChatGPT is a glance into what’s to come for AI services.
'The first and most obvious threat is that AI-enhanced social media will wash ever-larger torrents of garbage into our public conversation.'
Yup. #technology#ArtificialIntelligence#ai
The only way that technology can boost the standard of living is if there are economic policies in place to distribute the benefits of technology appropriately. #AI will certainly reduce labor costs and increase profits for corporations, but that is entirely different from improving our standard of living.
The only way that technology can boost the standard of living is if there are economic policies in place to distribute the benefits of technology appropriately. #AI will certainly reduce labor costs and increase profits for corporations, but that is entirely different from improving our standard of living.
How much do you ask AI (such as #bing#chatGPT or #Bard) and share your feelings and dilemmas that happen in your life?
I sometimes do, used to do it a bit more.
Just noticed that Bing isn't as good as it's used to be.
I asked a question, Bing said f"a human might say {option 1} but maybe {option too} as good too. you do you".
Bard, on the other hand, gave a much more informative and decicive response, much longer, that I felt better reading. (comparison in comment) #AI#artificialintelligence
The AI Index 2023 report by the Stanford Institute for Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HAI) is one of the most comprehensive and trustworthy studies to date. Its more than 350 pages cover topics ranging from the cost of AI training to efforts to mitigate bias in language models and the impact of technology on public policy.
"It’s increasingly looking like this may be one of the most hilariously inappropriate applications of AI that we’ve seen yet." I am riveted by the extensive documentation of how ChatGPT-powered Bing is now completely unhinged. @simon has chronicled it beautifully here: https://simonwillison.net/2023/Feb/15/bing/
…writes the following (p.6), which, though the article is not intended for an application in #ArtificialIntelligence , IMO would explain why LLM’s will reach a learning frontier that only embodiment, i.e. #robotics, will solve:
“On the one..."