tallship, to foss

@Teri_Kanefield

Hi Teri,

I'm writing you because I came across your blog site and thought you may be able to leverage the Fediverse in conjunction with your WordPress site's publishing horsepower.

As a #FOSS advocate with great enthusiasm for mass #Fediverse adoption, I'd like to suggest a couple of things for you to consider, and the following treatment can also benefit others who also have bridged over to the Fediverse that already have a WordPress installation, or have been looking to deploy one.

  • First, that you think about establishing a Fediverse account other than that of a stock Mastodon instance. Sure, keep your @Teri_Kanefield@mastodon.social account, just create another account for yourself on a platform that will afford you more options that can facilitate your creative freedom (let's not dissect that word, lolz) to publish posts that are in excess of a paltry 500 characters, along with things like Markup capabilities, Etc. Just a thought. ...

This leads into the next suggestion, ...

  • Second, why not make that account your existing WordPress blog, where you already have a permanent, branded presence and readership? Let's supercharge your WordPress site by making it a full and complete publishing platform completely integrated with the Fediverse.

There's a couple of methodologies, but generally speaking, once you install the ActivityPub plugin any future blog posts are on the Fediverse as well as any other distribution channels you may already have (say, by virtue of having installed the JetPack Social plugin that propagates into the deprecated silo networks).

One method I can recommend is to follow this basic procedure to popularize your blog posts and gain followers - just like you probably have been with the mastodon.social account you already have:

  1. ) If you've already created a new account on a more feature complete platform that's better suited for long form posting, inline images, Etc., like #Friendica, #Socialhome, any #Misskey or #Pleroma family fork platform, #Hubzilla, or #Mitra (They all have excellent Markdown support too); simply follow your #WordPress user account @<username>@terikanefield.com. If not, then simply follow your WordPress Fediverse user account from your existing masto account - which you should do anyway since I gather you have some respectable measure of followers.

2.) Everytime you publish a new news article / blog post on your WordPress site, you'll see it in your stream on your fediverse accounts.

3.) Boost each article from those accounts, your followers will see what you boost in their streams.

4.) encourage them to boost as well and/or comment - you'll see those comments in the reply section of each article on your WordPress site - Awesome!

5.) Now that you have followers of your WordPress user's Fediverse account you should be able to garner more direct interaction on your WordPress site, instead of having to post links to those posts from your mastodon.social account.

  1. ) From your @<username>@terikanefield.com account at your WordPress site, you can now directly interact with your followers, even those who post replies/comments to your articles, whether or not they are a follower of yours.

I'm taking the time to write because I see that you have a relatively decent circulation and engagement between readers and your blog articles, and the more people that see you engaging with others in the Fediverse directly from your WordPress site, the more people are encouraged to Join the Fediverse.

I am, as stated in my profile and also leading in to this, a FOSS and Privacy Advocate.

So here's a couple of links, one to the plugin itself - it's easy to install and deploy. Another older one that's still relevant that shows you how to do the install, and I think that's about it. We'll see ;)

  • WordPress ActivityPub Plugin - This is where you get the plugin
  • HowTo with Video - Really simple, easy install, right from your WordPress admin panel
  • JetPac Social - I'm definitely not a fan of this kind of engagement (with the privacy mining, deprecated, monolithic silo networks), but you do you - it can afford you with even greater reach through syndication, and if you write about the Fediverse, well, ... So much the better!
  • You should also consider following the magnanimous @pfefferle - one of the primary authors of the #ActivityPub_Plugin.

I hope that helps! All the best!

#tallship

.

jaywink, to threads
@jaywink@jasonrobinson.me avatar

Threads has entered the fediverse - Engineering at Meta

https://engineering.fb.com/2024/03/21/networking-traffic/threads-has-entered-the-fediverse/

I must admit I never thought this would actually happen, federating with the Fediverse, but it did, woah. Pretty huge moment for . Now lets hope plays it nice with interop, well as nice as any of the other bickering and sometimes somewhat poorly interopping platforms are doing :P

While I totally expect half of the Fedi to go on an instance blocking spree, personally I'm happy for this development. And hey, even if half of the Fedi does go on an instance blocking spree, that is fine. It's all a part of the freedom provided by a decentralized federated network.

It's a huge pity settled on building their own platform. We could be a very big nice happy family had they chosen to adopt ActivityPub during the evaluations they did.

I just hope resharing Zuck's first Fedi post wont demolish my poor instance 😅

tallship, to fediverse
@tallship@catodon.social avatar

It sure would be nice if the inline images from servers were picked up as such by all of the other Platform on the

I can haz ? 🍔

.

RE: socialhome.network/content/1c0a8144-3273-4d12-b2e0-a51649672e93/

tallship, to fediverse
@tallship@socialhome.network avatar

IOW - the reader doesn't have to leave their comfy Fediverse client, experience or venture into unsafe outside networks or sites with trackers and other data mining engines.

https://socialhome.network/media/uploads/2024/02/26/34549a15-7928-496b-ad81-43e781a07c73.jpg

A mission statement? As a decades long FOSS and Privacy advocate, it's really not much of a question to me. My immediate answer is, "But, of course." We should strive for a UX that users will adore. Fact: I love Faceplant - I do! I don't use it, and stay in a galaxy far, far away, but I'm not gonna lie and say it's not one of the niftiest UIs in existence. Everything is smooth and just the right amount of opaque and glossy and smooth scrolling through the stream, wall, timeline, *whatev.

If we make it pretty, then that's going to win adopters from the general public. And if we gain people from the general population.... pretty kewl.

  • Make it functional
  • Make it featureful
  • Make it pritty (sic)

https://socialhome.network/media/uploads/2024/02/26/7f9adbe1-be51-47e9-b71f-09222f0f8bb2.jpg

The Fediverse isn't a single, particular protocol powered network - OStatus, ActivityPub, Diaspora, Zot6, Nomad, Etc. is a horizontally scaling, logical network topography. It's the foundational concept that disrupts a monolithic architecture. Both are great, but when you're talking about human social intercommunications it sure sounds a heck of a lot more safe when there's one, three, or twenty seven accounts on a single Fediverse instance than twenty seven hundred or thousand user accounts. I'd argue that with that many active user accounts, you're really accommodating the deprecated, monolithic silo model.

I was successful, very recently, in encouraging a popular sharing service to completely drop the mastodon logo and stop using it. The project lead related to me that of note was the fact that all of the folks who had galleries had different addresses, not half of them actually mastodon addresses. All of the mastodon logos have now been replaced with the Fediverse logo. AND - THAT - IS - AWESOME

image/jpeg

wagtail, to fediverse
@wagtail@fosstodon.org avatar

👋 Fediverse folks, what do you think of adding support in or ? See discussion: https://github.com/wagtail/wagtail/discussions/9732

It’s a neat idea, a few other platforms have it as a package, we’re wondering how much interest there would be

phiofx,

@wagtail its a great idea as it would make potentially any django / wagtail installation a first class citizen of the fediverse, expanding functionality in various novel ways

There are already several django based activitypub servers (I am aware of , , ) and related projects (, ) but it seems there is zero code re-use among them.

youronlyone, to mastodon
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

The software setting of is now a dropdown menu. Currently only for mastodon.social and mastodon.online.

Maybe it's temporary but if it's not, they'll have to add at least a hundred reputable and popular servers. Also, it's Mastodon software only. There are far more software, older and/or better than Mastodon which will probably not get support, at least as far as the approach I am seeing.

Since they are only adding cross-posting support, it should be fine to add support for other software like and , to mention a few.

Still, what I want to see is for Spoutible to federate with the network as well as network (a.k.a. ).

Original thread: https://spoutible.com/thread/23239609

kushal, to photography
@kushal@toots.dgplug.org avatar

Finally https://kushaldas.photography is properly setup again (I hope).

Deus,
@Deus@charcha.cc avatar

Not sure if you already know but if that Flickr(ish) layout is your thing, why not give Socialhome a try? You would be federated too and your Local timeline would look like the one you have set up.

Don’t know about the technicalities though - ease of setup, performance, search and other features etc.

youronlyone, to fediverse
@youronlyone@c.im avatar

A fictional way of looking at

  • Web (the multiverse)
  • Zot (a.k.a. protocol universe)
  • galaxy
    -- note 1: communication with the Fediverse is standard practice in this universe.
  • galaxy
    -- note 1: developed a way to communicate across the Mycelial Web (a.k.a. the multiverse). Can also communicate with BlueSky and diaspora.
  • Mycelium (a.k.a. protocol universe)
  • galaxy
    -- note 1: developed a way to communicate across the Mycelial Web (a.k.a. the multiverse). Can also communicate with BlueSky and diaspora.
  • galaxy
  • firefish.social star/solar system
  • galaxy
  • c.im star/solar system
  • galaxy
  • c.wtf star/solar system
  • galaxy
  • pixelfed.social star/solar system
  • Sky Mycelium (a.k.a. universe)
  • galaxy
  • bsky.app star/solar system
  • Mycelium (a.k.a. protocol universe)
  • Matrix Mycelium (a.k.a. protocol universe)
  • Mycelium
  • galaxy
  • galaxy (closed borders; isolated; aware of other mycelium/universes)
  • star/solar system
  • #X Mycelium (closed borders; isolated; have not discovered there are other mycelium/universes besides their own)
  • Mycelium (closed borders; isolated; rumours has it their government decided against connecting with the other mycelium/universes, but they are aware)
  • Mycelium (closed borders; isolated; aware of other mycelium/universes)
  • / Mycelium - collapsed
  • * Mycelium (Diaspora protocol universe)
  • diaspora galaxy empire (software)
  • diasp.org star/solar system (instance)
  • galaxy (software)
  • socialhome.network star/solar system (instance)
  • + ( universe) - collapsed

… and so on.

boris_pohler, to mastodon German
@boris_pohler@bildung.social avatar

Warum ?

Ich beobachte aktuell eine große Wanderung von Twitter zu . Vor allem der aktive Kern der Twitterer zieht dahin um.

Mein Frage an Euch: Warum Mastodon und keine der anderen Alternativen?

[Bitte teilen]

PaulaToThePeople,
notesnook, to fediverse
@notesnook@fosstodon.org avatar

Asking all the and experts:

Would it make sense for Notesnook to be able to publish notes to ActivityPub? Is that a right use case for it or would it require hacks? What would be the best way to approach/implement this?

From a very quick research, it'd require a self hosted fediverse compatible server. Users would have to sign up or their accounts would need to be created there.

What then?

tallship,

@notesnook

Thank you for putting out that query - short answer is...

Yes. You definitely have a use case here, but first, being just a little familiar with your product I'd like to welcome you to the even though your arrival coincided with the November Rain phenomenon that was much todo about nothing, and in the end, most Twitugees simply returned there after creating accounts here - I'm glad you stuck around! You're product is FOSS, and this is a world here in the Fediverse, so it makes sense, this being your natural home and where people can expect to find you :)

Ever since I decided to ditch the proprietary Evernote, I've been using a Plugin that uploads my buffer to a Gist in an easy peasy way - it would be really kewl if I had a way to send (encrypted or unencrypted) notes to myself as a Fediverse DM, or share some of them with a select group of others in such a manner - Maybe (if it's textual in nature) actual clips I've saved. The graphics, well, if they are uploaded as a graphic that will work too, and they can even be sent to accounts (if there is a graphics or movie file).

So, you're concerned about having to setup a centralized server or something that your userbase can be recognized on or something? Perhaps like a relay of sorts? I don't think that's the way to go actually. It sounds like a lot of heartache that might not even surivive beyond the intial proof of concept is rolled out - Spam being just one reason that makes the likelihood of failure a distinct possibility.

Here's what I think you can try doing, and it will alleviate any grandiose plans you may have been kicking around - Keep it in the client. A feature mechanism that either lets you clip and post it as an NOTE to a user's actual instance (server) where they already have an account - You can collect the user's Fediverse account credentials and use that to post to their own existing account - no additional infrastructure is required on your part.

Those posts can be a single post to oneself (a private Fediverse DM to themselves) or it can include a list of recipients - just like any other post you can make.

This will also afford you the absolute maximum in too! You don't have to accept any registrations obo your Fediverse features - you're merely allowing people with existing Fediverse accounts to enter their credentials into your client and then your users make the decision as to whether they want to use your existing store or their Fediverse account to publish the clips to their stores there.

Since you've been around here for a while now, I'm sure you've realized how severely limited mastodon is when it comes to ways you can exploit the existing capabilities in the Fediverse - I've already mentioned Pixelfed, but there's a lot of other platforms that support HTTP signatures necessary for backfills and e2ee constructs; the support for BBCode and/or Markdown; post containing text with character counts greater than the paltry 500 characters that masto can muster, (actually, only Misskey and Firefish support that at this time AFAIK); local only posts (shared only with those who have accounts on the same instance), and a host of other unsupported features in masopub.

I appreciate that you made the effort to address this as an ActivityPub and Fediverse capability, and not simply, "yet another mastodon branded feature". Especially when mastodon won't be able to take advantage of many of the advanced features you already offer that other more capable Fediverse platforms can make use of :)

Platforms like , , , , , , , Pleroma, , , , , and even - those latter three have potentially, especially ambitious use cases with clips and notes being able to be actually published on platforms already built for long form or 'blobs' to be pushed to them. Hubzilla, , and Friendica have special features to accommodate your products notes too :)

If you focus on adding support for people to enter their Fediverse account credentials, or multiple accounts like and and support, Then those are the servers you need right there! The spam problem remains as it is with the particular instances, since they control the new account registrations.

There's also the rapid adoption of and single-user focused Fediverse platforms too, such as:

  • MicroBlogPub
  • Tapir
  • Bovine
  • And of course, any platform, now matter how heavy or resource intensive can be deployed as a smolweb or single-user instance (even the klunky kludgey mastodon). And speaking of which, there are several popular forks that don't have these limitations that are very popular like and -soc, Etc.

There may even be some use cases for and too, as link/discussion boards too - perhaps posting from a users vault/store to those platforms? There's a lot of different possibilities but ActivityPub can open up a huge market for you while at the same time Fediverse is exposed to large numbers of people who will discover that they too may have a good use case to adopt for themselves a Fediverse account :)

tl;dr: Basically, yes! there's a huge use case for your thoughts there - and if you're reading this on a Mitra, , Soapbox, , Firefish, Friendica, Hubzilla, or Misskey server, you'll see some very pretty formatting in Markdown - if you're reading this on a regular mastodon server (not one of the really good and popular forks), then... not so much - but at least mastodon does degrade Markdown and HTML somewhat gracefully :)

Well I hope that helps and do feel free to reach out to me via my contact methods listed in my profile or in the Fediverse-City Matrix room, and I'm sure that we can get a few of some of the more prominent Fediverse platform devs to round-table with you for some wire framing sessions.

I'm confident that you'll find a lot of support in your endeavor to achieve this initiative.

Well I hope that helps. Enjoy!

.

attached: Fediverse logo in gummy bear jelly colors

smallcircles, to random
@smallcircles@social.coop avatar

is a fully self-hostable, open-source collaborative bookmark manager to collect, organize and archive webpages.

https://linkwarden.app

@linkwarden is -licensed

smallcircles,
@smallcircles@social.coop avatar
gnulinux, to wordpress German
@gnulinux@social.anoxinon.de avatar

Fediverse-Serie: ActivityPub bei WordPress - einen Blog in ein soziales Netzwerk bringen

Das Plugin implementiert das ActivityPub-Protokoll in einen Word-Press-Blog, was bedeutet, dass Blogbeiträge im Fediverse verfolgt werden können. Darüber hinaus werden Antworten aus dem Fediverse automatisch zu Kommentaren im Blogbeitrag.

https://gnulinux.ch/fediverse-serie-activitypub-bei-wordpress-einen-blog-in-ein-soziales-netzwerk-bringen

BlindSeer, to fediverse German

Since Mastodon's limit on characters doesn't allow lengthy Posts I have in mind on some subjects I pondered starting a . Checking The possibilities of The I am a little Bit crushed with information. I found Websites saying or would be for blogging, but couldn't find much Else, since Most explanations are about Mastodon.

Could someone pleased and elaborate where The differences are, or give some pointers? 😊

Thanks in advance.

jo, to fediverse
briankrebs, to random

I'm pretty sure Mastodon is the first social network I've been on that didn't immediately ask me to betray all of the people in my address book.

tallship,
@tallship@social.sdf.org avatar

@briankrebs

I'm pretty sure that the is one of the first social networks I've been on that didn't ever ask me to betray any of the people in my address book.

.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • anitta
  • khanakhh
  • thenastyranch
  • Youngstown
  • hgfsjryuu7
  • slotface
  • rosin
  • InstantRegret
  • tacticalgear
  • kavyap
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • DreamBathrooms
  • PowerRangers
  • tester
  • magazineikmin
  • Durango
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • vwfavf
  • ethstaker
  • cisconetworking
  • GTA5RPClips
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • provamag3
  • All magazines