openrightsgroup, to random
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

"Private communication is a fundamental human right, and in the online world, the best tool we have to defend this right is end-to-end encryption."

The government is gambling with our privacy to introduce generalised suveillance.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/crackdowns-on-encrypted-messaging-dont-help-the-children

openrightsgroup, to privacy
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Why is the government flying in the face of tech and security experts?

The Online Safety Bill reveals the government’s hand: their priority isn’t safety, it’s surveillance.

Read today's open letter from 68 experts about powers that breach encryption to scan our private messages ⤵️

https://haddadi.github.io/UKOSBOpenletter.pdf

openrightsgroup, to privacy
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

During the debate on the Online Safety Bill in the UK House of Lords, Lord Moylan laid out the dangers of the encryption-busting clause that threatens our privacy and security.

Take action to stop the spy clause as the Bill moves into its final stages.

➡️ https://action.openrightsgroup.org/dont-scan-me

video/mp4

AnnemarieBridy, to random
@AnnemarieBridy@mastodon.lawprofs.org avatar

Good for Signal! If a willfully misguided government regulation fundamentally breaks your product in a way that compromises user safety, it doesn’t make much sense to continue offering it in the affected market.

Meredith Whittaker Reaffirms That Signal Would Leave UK If Forced By Privacy Bill - Slashdot https://it.slashdot.org/story/23/09/22/1913215/meredith-whittaker-reaffirms-that-signal-would-leave-uk-if-forced-by-privacy-bill

avoidthehack, to mastodon
echo_pbreyer, to privacy German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 Further objective of the surveillance programme:

Access to date in transit – in particular when encrypted or protected by " preserving architecture which prevents the identification of Internet users":
https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/document/download/0b146700-0b6c-4b42-b7c9-39dc9f260c4d_en?filename=HLG%20background%20document%2013022024_en.pdf

openrightsgroup, to privacy
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

"Ignorance combined with arrogance is a dangerous mix."

The government is pursuing a legislative agenda that'll leave people the UK without secure messaging services.

Powers to scan everyone's private messages must be removed from the Online Safety Bill.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-66304002

openrightsgroup, to random
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Concerns about the encryption-busting provisions in the are growing.

@Mer__edith told the Today Programme that putting client-side scanning on everyone's devices implements a system of mass surveillance.

Listen in full from 1:48:25: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/m001m5n5

video/mp4

openrightsgroup, to privacy
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

“While the UK government has admitted it’s not possible to safely scan all of our private messages, it has granted Ofcom the powers to force tech companies to do so in the future.”

🗣 @JamesBaker, ORG Campaigns Manager.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2023/09/20/uk-passes-online-safety-bill-restricting-social-media-content/

tuxdevices, (edited ) to Europe
@tuxdevices@fosstodon.org avatar
aral, to random
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

Encrypted messaging provider: “We make our money selling this to the police.”

Tech folks: This is cool and normal.

echo_pbreyer, to random German
@echo_pbreyer@digitalcourage.social avatar

🇬🇧 To enable mass surveillance, 32 European police chiefs call for halting end-to-end encryption . This is an attack on our security and digital privacy in violation of fundamental rights!

More: https://www.patrick-breyer.de/en/police-chiefs-want-to-halt-secure-end-to-end-encryption-to-enable-chat-control-bulk-scanning-of-all-private-messages/

Em0nM4stodon, to random

Everyone has a
fundamental right to communicate without being observed by an undesired third-party.

This was the norm before. It needs to become the norm again.

Privacy is a Human Right.

End-to-end encryption enforces this right 🔒✨

phoenix_r_d, to MLS
@phoenix_r_d@mastodon.social avatar

The Messaging Layer Security (MLS) protocol has been published as RFC 9420 today! MLS is the first standardized and fully specified end-to-end encryption protocol. The specification is freely accessible, and its security has been analyzed in numerous academic publications.

Check out our blog post for a high-level overview of MLS, its practical applications, and why it matters.
https://blog.phnx.im/rfc-9420-mls/

aral, to apple
@aral@mastodon.ar.al avatar

Glad to hear Apple has killed its plans to implement privacy-destroying on-device scan and snitch into its devices (although it will make autocrats like Erdoğan unhappy to hear it because they likely had plans for it).

https://www.wired.com/story/apple-csam-scanning-heat-initiative-letter/

Here’s what I wrote about it at the time:

https://ar.al/2021/08/08/apple-is-trying-to-redefine-what-it-means-to-violate-your-privacy-we-must-not-let-it/

Remember that end-to-end encryption is moot if the ends are already compromised.

chris, to apple
@chris@mstdn.chrisalemany.ca avatar

Fascinating ... Apple joins Signal to provide the most secure end-to-end encrypted messaging protocols. Note: Apple engineers created their own “Levels” and magically theirs is the highest. ;) But regardless, this is obviously strong encryption.

"Support for PQ3 will start to roll out with the public releases of iOS 17.4, iPadOS 17.4, macOS 14.4, and watchOS 10.4, and is already in the corresponding developer preview and beta releases.”

https://security.apple.com/blog/imessage-pq3/

openrightsgroup, to UKpolitics
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Without ridding the Online Safety Bill of powers that 'open the door for mass surveillance' and 'the nullification of end-to-end encryption' it'll create a 'significant vulnerability' and 'effectively salt the earth' for any UK tech development.

https://www.standard.co.uk/tech/online-safety-bill-whatsapp-signal-element-breaking-encryption-mass-surveillance-messaging-apps-b1091873.html

openrightsgroup, to random
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

Unbelievable double-think happening here. The UK government is going full-throttle in its war on encryption, with the Online Safety Bill the vanguard in exposing the security of everyone's device.

Encryption protects us from cyber-criminals, keeps our messages private, and stops governments and corporations from spying on us. It is online safety for kids and everyone.

✍️ Sign our petition to save encryption: https://www.thepetitionsite.com/en-gb/takeaction/959/553/635/

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-65686989

Em0nM4stodon, to privacy

Tiny Privacy Tip About Encryption News 🔒🎉

As end-to-end encryption becomes more popular (yay! :rainbowdance:​),

Celebrate yes,

But also remain skeptical about how this word is used and if this claim warrants your trust.

Do not trust blindly.

End-to-end encryption is a wonderful protection when well implemented. But not all apps that use end-to-end encryption are equals.

Verify that:

  1. The provider is trustworthy :blobcatthinkingglare:​​

  2. Trustworthy third-parties have verified and confirmed the provider's claims 🔍​

  3. Metadata is also encrypted and/or that, ideally, its collection is minimized :blobcatpeekaboo:​

  4. Solid security measures protect the data as well (For example, if your data is end-to-end encrypted from your password but your password is vulnerable then your data is vulnerable as well) 🛡️​

  5. Encryption is truly end-to-end, meaning only the sender and the receiver can access the data and nobody else ​:ablobcatpeek:​

Finally keep in mind that even if a service uses minimal encryption (for example one that still collects a lot of unencrypted metadata) it is still better than the same service using no content encryption at all,

BUT there are almost always much better services that offer truly complete and well implemented end-to-end encryption for their services.

Always favor the latter when you have a choice 🔒✨

#TinyPrivacyTip #Privacy #Encryption #E2EE #RootForE2EE

openrightsgroup, to privacy
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

🚨 The latest in UK government wishful thinking has dropped.

Suella Braverman (Home Secretary) takes to The Telegraph with claims about encryption that don't stack up.

There's a failure to grasp how the Online Safety Bill will harm privacy, despite repeated warnings from experts.

➡️ Read our response: https://www.openrightsgroup.org/press-releases/online-safety-bill-suella-braverman-fails-to-understand-encryption-risk/

openrightsgroup, to UKpolitics
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

"End-to-end encryption keeps our data and our communications safe and secure. The proposed reforms to the Investigatory Powers Act are the government's latest attack on this technology."

🗣️ ORG Programme Manager @abigail

https://www.theregister.com/2023/11/07/ukgov_wants_prior_notice_of/

openrightsgroup, to security
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

People in the UK may be left in the wilderness without secure messaging services, if the retains its encryption busting clause.

Forcing platforms to comply with client-side scanning is state-mandated private surveillance of the kind that we see in authoritarian regimes. Platforms will leave rather than compromise and .

It'll particularly harm journalists, campaigners and activists who rely on to communicate safely.

https://techmonitor.ai/policy/privacy-and-data-protection/what-if-whatsapp-really-does-leave-the-uk

Em0nM4stodon, to privacy

The most dangerous
threat to privacy and to encryption is giving up.

Do not give up!

For yourself,
For your family,
For your friends,
For your communities,
And for the next generations,

Defend encryption.
Fight for our Digital Rights ✊✨



🎉

openrightsgroup, to random
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

The government have “pulled the veil off the intentions behind this bill” by making “scientifically unsubstantiated claims” about encryption.

It’s clear that the Online Safety Bill “really is attacking encryption.”

Read more from @Mer__edith

https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/uk-online-safety-bill-signal-whatsapp-privacy-encryption-b2324483.html

openrightsgroup, to random
@openrightsgroup@social.openrightsgroup.org avatar

The government knows and has admitted it cannot scan messages without undermining or breaking encryption, but wants to pretend otherwise. It is playing us for fools.

https://www.openrightsgroup.org/blog/omnishambles-over-encrypted-messages-continues/

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • kavyap
  • InstantRegret
  • GTA5RPClips
  • magazineikmin
  • mdbf
  • rosin
  • Youngstown
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • slotface
  • thenastyranch
  • osvaldo12
  • DreamBathrooms
  • anitta
  • ngwrru68w68
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cubers
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • tacticalgear
  • tester
  • normalnudes
  • Leos
  • megavids
  • provamag3
  • lostlight
  • All magazines