ajsadauskas, (edited ) to climate
@ajsadauskas@aus.social avatar

If you care about the planet, please make sure you sit down before you start reading this post about ExxonMobil.

So.

The CEO of ExxonMobil just said this in an interview: "We’ve waited too long to open the aperture on the solution sets in terms of what we need, as a society, to start reducing emissions."

https://fortune.com/2024/02/27/exxon-ceo-darren-woods-interview-pay-the-price-for-net-zero/

Who's the most influential voice on climate change? Who's to blame for inaction on climate change?

According to the CEO of ExxonMobil, it's environmental activists.

No, really:

"Frankly, society, and the activist—the dominant voice in this discussion—has tried to exclude the industry that has the most capacity and the highest potential for helping with some of the technologies."

Oh, and the CEO of ExxonMobil also apparently thinks consumers are to blame for climate inaction:

"Today we have opportunities to make fuels with lower carbon, but people aren’t willing to spend the money to do that."

Gets better.

He thinks unnamed 'people who generate emissions' should pay for it. (Rather than, say, major transnational oil companies.)

"People who are generating the emissions need to be aware of [it] and pay the price. That’s ultimately how you solve the problem."

https://fortune.com/2024/02/27/exxon-ceo-darren-woods-interview-pay-the-price-for-net-zero/

Worth including a quick reminder here that Exxon-Mobil made a US$36 billion profit in 2023: https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/exxon-beats-estimates-ends-2023-with-36-billion-profit-2024-02-02/#:~:text=HOUSTON%2C%20Feb%202%20(Reuters),higher%20oil%20and%20gas%20production.

Not gross revenue.

Profit.

So, remind me again. Who knew about climate change before most of the public?

"Exxon was aware of climate change, as early as 1977, 11 years before it became a public issue... This knowledge did not prevent the company (now ExxonMobil and the world’s largest oil and gas company) from spending decades refusing to publicly acknowledge climate change and even promoting climate misinformation."

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/exxon-knew-about-climate-change-almost-40-years-ago/

And just who, exactly, stood in the way reducing emissions all these years?

"ExxonMobil executives privately sought to undermine climate science even after the oil and gas giant publicly acknowledged the link between fossil fuel emissions and climate change, according to previously unreported documents...

"The new revelations are based on previously unreported documents subpoenaed by New York’s attorney general as part of an investigation into the company announced in 2015. They add to a slew of documents that record a decades-long misinformation campaign waged by Exxon, which are cited in a growing number of state and municipal lawsuits against big oil."

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/sep/14/exxonmobil-documents-wall-street-journal-climate-science

@fuck_cars

helenczerski, to climate

“By announcing hundreds of new oil and gas licences, the prime minister, Rishi Sunak, has become a “dangerous radical” pursuing “moral and economic madness”.

That is not the judgment of Just Stop Oil, or any other environmental campaign group, but the United Nations secretary general, António Guterres.”

https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/jul/31/new-oil-gas-licences-rishi-sunak-un-climate-crisis?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

CLondoner92, to london

#London #Transport #advertisement from 1980:
"If it takes one man one gallon of petrol to get to work. How many gallons will it take 68 men?" - London Transport - the fuelsavers
#Urbanism #Buses #Travel #fuel #oil

helenczerski, to climate

This is a horrendous decision: Rosebank, the largest untapped oilfield in UK waters, has been approved by the UK government. This comes via the regulator, the North Sea Transition Authority, which is in severe need of reform.

Over the last few weeks, I’ve been working on a podcast series about the structure and ownership of the UK oil sector, because this is essential understanding for dismantling it. It’s been eye-opening, but empowering. It’ll be out in 2-3 weeks.

helenczerski, to climate

I think I'm still in recovery from learning a few weeks ago that Canadian fossil fuel companies tell people that because it's "natural" gas that they produce, burning it can't hurt the environment. And people believe them. I sometimes wake up in the middle of the night, remember that and 🤯🤯🤯🤯

helenczerski, to science

I look forward to the day when we have to explain the oil industry to the next generation in the same way that our history teachers explain that yes, it used to be common to use lead in makeup, to smoke on planes, and to teach workers using radioactive paint to lick their brushes.

EU_Commission, to Russia
@EU_Commission@social.network.europa.eu avatar

We are getting rid of Russian fossil fuels.

In March, EU #oil imports from Russia fell by 90% compared to the 2019-2022 average. EU sanctions against #Russia and the G7 price cap on Russian petrol and related products are delivering results.

#REPowerEU #EU

GottaLaff, to climate
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Go get ‘em!

“Chicago sued 6 major companies and the primary fossil fuel lobbying group, alleging they funded & planned a campaign of climate change denial that directly affects the city’s residents.

..accused BP, Chevron, ConocoPhillips, Exxon Mobil, Phillips 66, Shell, & American Petroleum Institute of misleading the public about impact of their products and of contributing to the effects of on Chicago” https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/4480345-chicago-sues-oil-companies-for-impacts-of-climate-change/

GottaLaff, to climate
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

Oh hellz yeah.

companies will soon pay fees for emitting a climate ‘super-pollutant’
The action is one of the administration’s strongest against the fossil fuel industry under provisions of a 2022 climate law
https://www.washingtonpost.com/climate-environment/2024/01/12/methane-fee-epa-climate/

royaards, to Futurology
@royaards@newsie.social avatar

Greenwashing. Cartoon for Trouw.

#oil #future #earth #exploitation #greenwashing

ProPublica, to california
@ProPublica@newsie.social avatar

Will Pay Record Fines for Spills in

The penalties come after an investigation by The Desert Sun and ProPublica found that companies were profiting from illegal spills and California’s oversight of the industry was lax.

https://www.propublica.org/article/chevron-will-pay-record-fines-for-california-oil-spills?utm_source=mastodon&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=mastodon-post

petersuber, (edited ) to climate

"The on Thursday reached a conclusion that progressives have been shouting from the rooftops for decades: If governments redirected the trillions of dollars they spend annually to prop up fossil fuels…humanity would be in a much better position to address the crisis."
https://www.commondreams.org/news/world-bank-urges-redirection-harmful-fossil-fuel-subsidies

BTW, "trillions" is no exaggeration.
https://e360.yale.edu/digest/fossil-fuels-received-5-9-trillion-in-subsidies-in-2020-report-finds

Why is it so hard for influential orgs to say that and are part of the problem?

EyeOnAlaska, to Alaska
@EyeOnAlaska@alaskan.social avatar

35 years ago today, the Exxon Valdez had a "minor" drunk driving accident that changed our state. Not a single mention on the ADN website. Never forget.

myeyesaredim, to Canada

Can you guess how lobbyists acted while was on fire this summer?

and lobbyists met with the government 131 times to promote their interests, lobbying for:

  1. Delaying and weakening critical climate policies
  2. Pushing for exceptions, delays and loopholes in the Clean Electricity Regulations
  3. Asking for billions of dollars in government subsidies and financial guarantees

https://environmentaldefence.ca/2023/09/20/in-june-while-canada-was-burning-the-oil-and-gas-industry-lobbied-131-times/

GottaLaff, to Wisconsin
@GottaLaff@mastodon.social avatar

👏🏻“Judge has ordered Canadian energy company Enbridge (ENB.TO) to shutter portions of an pipeline that runs through tribal land in within three years and to pay the tribe nearly $5.2 million for trespassing plus a portion of its profits until the shutdown is completed.”

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-judge-orders-enbridge-shut-down-portions-wisconsin-pipeline-within-3-years-2023-06-17/

helenczerski, to climate

The oil industry has mostly operated in relative invisibility, and now lots of us want to see the back of it. But how does it operate, who controls and own it, how deep do its tentacles go into everyday life, and who will be impacted by getting rid of it?

To find out, do listen to our 4-part Intelligence Squared podcast Tides of Transformation (first part now out), looking at all of those questions, mostly in relation to the North Sea: https://www.intelligencesquared.com/tides-of-transformation/

ChrisMayLA6, to random
@ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us avatar

A theme is emerging:

After the friendly was engineered to be short on firm commitments & long on pious industry-friendly 'aspirations'... the news that in will be chaired by (another) oil industry veteran, should finally put paid to the idea that we can expect a radical & accelerated through this process.

Time ran out a while back to follow the oil industry's gradualism - our political generation is just fiddling while the planet burns!

Simulacrum, to politics

This guy drove up to our university union building in this repurposed bus with Shell’s logo redesigned to say “Hell” on it.

Inside the bus was this interactive and unique artistic exhibition of what giants are doing to the planet—all original work.

We had a long conversation about and too; bought some “Hell” merch from him to throw shade on Shell.

It gives me hope that civil society continues to find original ways to resist.

@breadandcircuses

Inside the bus. The artist who repurposed the bus is in the driver’s seat. Two people chatting with the artist and checking out the posters and stickers on the table for sale.
Inside of a bus redesigned to look like an exhibition gallery, designed with Shell’s colours and thematics. Two people checking out the exhibitions.
Exhibition writing on the bus’s interior. Header: “we’re experts in global warming.” Body text: “For decades, She’ll has helped pioneer dramatic change, and global warming is no exception. We understood the threat of carbon emissions heating the atmosphere long before it became a public issue and we’ve spent millions educating the public about just how confusing and uncertain the problem is. Now that the science of global warming is broadly accepted, we’re changing the gear. We’ve accepted the role we played in causing this problem, and we passionately believe we should be left alone to work on a solution while also figuring out how to get every last drop of oil out of the ground.”

ChrisMayLA6, (edited ) to random
@ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us avatar

For 13 days earlier this year activists boarded a support;.

Shell is now suing for over £2mn in damages, after court sanctioned negotiations broke down... because:

Shell said they'd reduce the claim if Greenpeace no longer directly protests at/on Shell facilities/ships;

Greenpeace responded they'd be willing to do that if Shell complied with a 2021 Dutch ruling requiring the to radically reduce emissions.

So, now Shell is back to court to try & silence Greenpeace!

climatebrad, to climate
@climatebrad@mastodon.social avatar
rra, to Netherlands
@rra@post.lurk.org avatar

https://www.nrc.nl/nieuws/2024/03/15/poetin-komt-tanken-bij-vlissingen-a4193179

Last week the NRC reported about a little-known refueling (bunkering) point in the south-west of the , at the entrance of the Schelde near . The newspaper uncovered that it is being used by a of often badly maintained and very old tanker vessels which play a pivotal role in turning sanctioned Russian in to not sanctioned oil. The vessels make their way from Baltic ports along the North Sea, either to India or Turkey. The newspaper called this bunkering point "Putin's petrol station", because on the way back the sanctioned vessels stock up on fuel. The ships all fly under several different "flags of convenience" and as their companies get put on sanction lists, the ships move to other owners.

It is not often that international politics, global capital, supply chains, the news and infrastructure congeal the way it does at Putin's Pitstop so I had to go take a look .

infra thread!

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • JUstTest
  • mdbf
  • ngwrru68w68
  • modclub
  • magazineikmin
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • khanakhh
  • InstantRegret
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • Durango
  • kavyap
  • DreamBathrooms
  • megavids
  • GTA5RPClips
  • tacticalgear
  • normalnudes
  • tester
  • osvaldo12
  • everett
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • anitta
  • provamag3
  • Leos
  • cisconetworking
  • lostlight
  • All magazines