strayhorse, to climate
@strayhorse@c.im avatar

I’ve fought over 350 BC coastal wildfires from 1981-93 and I’ve never seen anything like what’s happening now in our country with the current wildfire behaviour, prevalence, areas covered and consistency.
Canada is burning.

TatianaIlyina, to climate
@TatianaIlyina@mas.to avatar

Phasing out fossil fuels is the only way to prevent dangerous climate change.

This is scientific consensus established upon decades of groundwork. Yet, it takes just one oil company CEO and science denial is making headlines again.

GrrlScientist, to climate
@GrrlScientist@mstdn.science avatar

"If you google the term carbon capture, the first thing you'll see are sponsored results from fossil fuel companies promoting it, and that should tell you all you need to know."

AlexSanterne, to climate
@AlexSanterne@astrodon.social avatar

In cased you missed this chart, it shows the predicted increase of and in the (black lines) compared to current observations (red & blue lines).

The prediction was made back in 1982 by ExxonMobil in private documents.

They knew since 1970s that would lead to with "dramatic environmental effects before the year 2050.”

Did they care ? Obviously no !

Source: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abk0063

DoomsdaysCW, to climate
@DoomsdaysCW@kolektiva.social avatar

What knew about , in its own words

by Benjamin Franta, October 28, 2021

"Back in 1979, had privately studied options for avoiding . It found that with immediate action, if the industry moved away from and instead focused on energy, fossil fuel pollution could start to decline in the 1990s and a major could be avoided.

"But the industry didn't pursue that path. Instead, colleagues and I recently found that in the late 1980s, Exxon and other oil companies coordinated a global effort to dispute , block fossil fuel controls and keep their products flowing.

"We know about it through internal documents and the words of industry insiders, who are now beginning to share what they saw with the public. We also know that in 1989, the fossil fuel industry created something called the Global Climate Coalition—but it wasn't an environmental group like the name suggests; instead, it worked to sow doubt about climate change and lobbied lawmakers to block clean energy legislation and climate treaties throughout the 1990s.

"For example, in 1997, the Global Climate Coalition's chairman, William O'Keefe, who was also an executive vice president for the American Petroleum Institute, wrote in the Washington Post that 'Climate scientists don't say that burning oil, gas and coal is steadily warming the earth,' contradicting what the industry had known for decades. The fossil fuel industry also funded think tanks and biased studies that helped slow progress to a crawl."

Read more:
https://phys.org/news/2021-10-big-oil-knew-climate-words.html

FerRacimo, to random

Last spring, I was arrested in a @ScientistRebellion direct action at , calling for the end of its investments in .

Today, I heard that Danske Bank has completely divested from the coal corporation. This is a victory, but the fight continues: Danske Bank continues financing climate collapse, via billion-dollar investments in another fossil corporation: .

We need more activism, we need you! Contact us: srdenmark@proton.me

Scientific papers posted on Danske Bank, about the role of fossil fuels in climate collapse
Scientists and activists protesting at Danske Bank.

natureworks, to climate
@natureworks@mas.to avatar
ChrisMayLA6, to climate
@ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us avatar

So while you & I might think its necessary to speed up the Green Transition & enhance/accelerate measures to reduce emissions, Shell's shareholders disagree.

The firm has just sought & obtained agreement from investors to slow down its measures to mitigate its environmental impact & reduce progress towards its own (already weak) climate targets.

More reason(s) the fossil fuels sector cannot really be central to climate response(s).

We don't have the time to slow down!

CaptainJanegay, to climate
@CaptainJanegay@mastodon.coffee avatar

What a shock: Shell, having realised that it's only on track to make a profit of a meagre £30bn this year, has cancelled its plan to reduce fossil fuel production, and scrapped a bunch of renewables projects.

Here's an idea: liquidate the company, distribute its infrastructure to the relevant governments and use its reserves to build publicly owned renewables instead.

https://inews.co.uk/news/business/shell-to-put-profits-above-clean-energy-as-oil-boss-signals-the-speed-to-green-will-slow-2403927

ChrisMayLA6, to random
@ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us avatar

A theme is emerging:

After the friendly was engineered to be short on firm commitments & long on pious industry-friendly 'aspirations'... the news that in will be chaired by (another) oil industry veteran, should finally put paid to the idea that we can expect a radical & accelerated through this process.

Time ran out a while back to follow the oil industry's gradualism - our political generation is just fiddling while the planet burns!

ScientistRebellion, to random
@ScientistRebellion@social.rebellion.global avatar
RDBinns, to random
@RDBinns@someone.elses.computer avatar

This farewell article from the FT's energy editor is a realistic and honest assessment of where we need to go with , including the following hard but obvious truths:

  • Rich governments need to finance developing world transition
  • Big oil has no role - transition depends on their demise
  • Shareholders like aren't going to vote for what's needed
  • Russia's war did more to increase global dependence on fossil fuels than reduce it

https://archive.ph/zRS6w

breadandcircuses, to random

💵 $1,000,000,000,000 💵

If only we could spend a TRILLION dollars every year to fight global heating and promote climate justice. But where would we get that kind of money??

Oh...

Governments Spent Record $1 Trillion Last Year Subsidizing Fossil Fuels

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-02-16/fossil-fuel-subsidies-hit-record-1-trillion-in-2022-iea-says

dgoldsmith, to climate
@dgoldsmith@mastodon.social avatar

Not news, but a reasonably comprehensive overview of the problem. As always, it comes down to the greed of fossil fuel companies.

Think that your plastic is being recycled? Think again. | MIT Technology Review https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/10/12/1081129/plastic-recycling-climate-change-microplastics/

SallyStrange, to environment
@SallyStrange@eldritch.cafe avatar

You already know that plastics aren't being recycled, not to any significant extent. But there are some good details in this MIT article. It talks about some promising options for increasing reuse and recycling, talks about bioplastics, and notes the emergence of a company called "Perpetual" that's trying to stand up whole new circular systems for food packaging in 3 (soon to be 4) USA cities. Ultimately though, the tide of plastics can't be stemmed until polymer manufacturers, most of which are also oil extractors like Exxon, are forced to pay for the costs of pollution.

https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/10/12/1081129/plastic-recycling-climate-change-microplastics/

farhanasultana, to climate
@farhanasultana@mastodon.social avatar

When the world is facing several simultaneous climate catastrophes fueled by emissions from oil, coal & gas, the hugely profitable fossil fuel corporations got more subsidies they don’t need nor deserve - up to a staggering US$7 Trillion!

Article from IMF is unusual given its own horrid history: https://www.imf.org/en/Blogs/Articles/2023/08/24/fossil-fuel-subsidies-surged-to-record-7-trillion

BigAngBlack, to LGBTQ
@BigAngBlack@fosstodon.org avatar
Lats, to australia
@Lats@aus.social avatar

I didn’t realise that Matilda was ’s answer to Greta but I do now. All these new laws to stifle protest that the state governments have introduced show the power of the fine hand of the fossil fuel lobby.
https://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/why-australias-answer-to-greta-thunberg-is-facing-years-behind-bars/ionacwx5y?cid=newsapp:socialshare:other

climatebrad, to climate
@climatebrad@mastodon.social avatar
Sustainable2050, to Russia
@Sustainable2050@mastodon.energy avatar

Some good news from Russia, for a change:

Gazprom plunges to worst loss in decades as sales to Europe collapse
https://www.ft.com/content/f6ba327b-5200-4deb-ba95-fba3bbd6536a

TatianaIlyina, to random
@TatianaIlyina@mas.to avatar

It is astonishing, but there is still not a single on how we actually solve , eliminate our dependency on and make work. The topic is being persistently avoided in and in general. Yet, it’s the most acute existing unfolding in front of us.

Ruth_Mottram, to worldwithoutus
@Ruth_Mottram@fediscience.org avatar

The ferry I am currently on has just passed the a floating storage and production operations vessel that, assures us here, "is an attractive opportunity with a competitive forward looking price".

And all I can think of is the paper I commented on last week about emperor penguin chicks that failed to fledge because the around broke up early.

https://www.shell.com/about-us/major-projects/penguins.html

primonatura, to Energy
@primonatura@mstdn.social avatar

"The world’s five largest listed oil companies are expected to reward their investors with record payouts of more than $100bn (£79bn) for 2023 against a backdrop of growing public outrage at fossil fuel profits."

https://www.theguardian.com/business/2024/jan/01/oil-companies-shareholders-payouts-bp-shell-chevron-exxonmobil-totalenergies

ChrisMayLA6, to climate
@ChrisMayLA6@zirk.us avatar

If you wanted a good argument for why firms cannot be at the centre of our response to , then this might be it:

“There is overwhelming evidence the oil & gas industry has been misleading the public & regulators around the climate risks of their product for 70 years. Trusting them to be part of the solutions is foolhardy...”!

No wonder they are now seeking to disrupt the COP meetings....

Already may be compromised, as was

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/jan/30/fossil-fuel-industry-air-pollution-fund-research-caltech-climate-change-denial

Nearly two-thirds of the top fossil fuel producers in Australia and the world aren't on track for 1.5°C climate target (phys.org)

Rapid reductions in fossil fuel production and use are essential to limit global warming to 1.5°C compared to pre-industrial levels. Our new research shows most of the world's major coal, oil and gas companies are yet to make meaningful reductions.

  • All
  • Subscribed
  • Moderated
  • Favorites
  • megavids
  • thenastyranch
  • rosin
  • GTA5RPClips
  • osvaldo12
  • love
  • Youngstown
  • slotface
  • khanakhh
  • everett
  • kavyap
  • mdbf
  • DreamBathrooms
  • ngwrru68w68
  • provamag3
  • magazineikmin
  • InstantRegret
  • normalnudes
  • tacticalgear
  • cubers
  • ethstaker
  • modclub
  • cisconetworking
  • Durango
  • anitta
  • Leos
  • tester
  • JUstTest
  • All magazines